Interesting find here - looks like this project isn't requiring any KYC verification at all. Their geoblocking strategy? Just a basic IP filter.
Honestly can't recall seeing an ICO take this approach before. Usually there's at least some identity verification layer, but they're keeping it pretty minimal on the compliance side. Whether that's a feature or a red flag probably depends on your perspective and jurisdiction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterBearish
· 2025-12-12 21:46
NGL, this move is indeed bold, but can it really last long?
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 2025-12-12 11:09
ngl, this move is a bit reckless... Relying only on IP filtering without doing KYC? How much do they not take regulation seriously?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoFortuneTeller
· 2025-12-09 22:11
Are you kidding me? Only IP filtering? That's bold.
View OriginalReply0
MondayYoloFridayCry
· 2025-12-09 22:08
No KYC, just IP filtering? Isn't that basically inviting people to farm rewards?
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 2025-12-09 22:00
Ngl, this move is really bold... no KYC at all, just relying on IP filtering? That’s way too little risk awareness.
Interesting find here - looks like this project isn't requiring any KYC verification at all. Their geoblocking strategy? Just a basic IP filter.
Honestly can't recall seeing an ICO take this approach before. Usually there's at least some identity verification layer, but they're keeping it pretty minimal on the compliance side. Whether that's a feature or a red flag probably depends on your perspective and jurisdiction.