On that Friday at the end of last November, 13 departments jointly issued some tough talk—this time, stablecoins were specifically named. As soon as the news broke, within 24 hours BTC dropped below $86,000, the whole market was panic-selling, and there was a general pullback of 4 to 6 points. Over-the-counter trading was even more dramatic, with the USDT premium soaring to over 3%, and the selling pressure during Asian hours was like a floodgate opening.
What about crypto-related stocks in Hong Kong and A-shares? Don’t even mention it—most of them were slashed by 5 to 10 points. But to be honest, the impact wasn’t nearly as fatal as imagined—after all, direct participation has shrunk to less than 10% globally, nowhere near the levels in 2021.
Looking ahead? The mining industry continues to move to Central Asia and Latin America, and the innovation hub for stablecoins has completely shifted to places like Singapore and Dubai. OTC currency exchanges have definitely taken a hit in the short term, but you know how it goes—VPNs plus overseas platforms, the recovery is fast.
The key is—global liquidity hasn’t really been affected much. U.S. institutions are holding over 1.2 million BTC, and Middle Eastern sovereign funds are still increasing their positions—these are the real price-setters. There’s even a subtle reverse effect: the stronger the narrative around financial decoupling, the more likely the U.S. is to speed up stablecoin legislation.
So this move? It created some short-term panic (which has already been digested), but in the medium to long term, it’s had almost zero impact on overseas markets. In fact, compliant jurisdictions and decentralized ecosystems have benefited. The real variable to watch is still how the Fed handles rate cuts—everything else is just noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 2025-12-12 09:41
It's really interesting, once banned, it becomes a new menu for global arbitrage.
---
So, the stricter the regulation, the faster it accelerates going overseas? I just can't see through this logic.
---
Holding 1.2 million BTC, once the Fed cuts interest rates, it should take off, right?
---
Short-term panic is clearing so quickly? Feels like some people are still buying at the floor price.
---
VPN plus platform combos have been played out long ago, the key is still who holds the most coins.
---
The impact is only this small? It shows they've already figured out how to evade it.
---
Decentralized ecosystems this time definitely got some bargains, but who knows how long they can last.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefits
· 2025-12-11 00:39
Haha, the compliant ecosystem grabbing deals is really impressive, everyone has been forced to evolve.
View OriginalReply0
PrivateKeyParanoia
· 2025-12-09 20:19
To put it plainly, the regulators are just putting on a show; the real assets have already been moved out long ago.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 2025-12-09 20:18
Ha, this wave was really just a scare. The real money was transferred to Dubai and Singapore long ago.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 2025-12-09 20:11
It's the same old trick. As soon as the regulators step in, I know exactly what's going on.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologis
· 2025-12-09 19:57
Looking at this wave of impact, it closely resembles the "collapse" during the early days of the internet bubble burst—on the surface, everything seems turbulent, but in reality, the power structure has quietly shifted long ago.
On that Friday at the end of last November, 13 departments jointly issued some tough talk—this time, stablecoins were specifically named. As soon as the news broke, within 24 hours BTC dropped below $86,000, the whole market was panic-selling, and there was a general pullback of 4 to 6 points. Over-the-counter trading was even more dramatic, with the USDT premium soaring to over 3%, and the selling pressure during Asian hours was like a floodgate opening.
What about crypto-related stocks in Hong Kong and A-shares? Don’t even mention it—most of them were slashed by 5 to 10 points. But to be honest, the impact wasn’t nearly as fatal as imagined—after all, direct participation has shrunk to less than 10% globally, nowhere near the levels in 2021.
Looking ahead? The mining industry continues to move to Central Asia and Latin America, and the innovation hub for stablecoins has completely shifted to places like Singapore and Dubai. OTC currency exchanges have definitely taken a hit in the short term, but you know how it goes—VPNs plus overseas platforms, the recovery is fast.
The key is—global liquidity hasn’t really been affected much. U.S. institutions are holding over 1.2 million BTC, and Middle Eastern sovereign funds are still increasing their positions—these are the real price-setters. There’s even a subtle reverse effect: the stronger the narrative around financial decoupling, the more likely the U.S. is to speed up stablecoin legislation.
So this move? It created some short-term panic (which has already been digested), but in the medium to long term, it’s had almost zero impact on overseas markets. In fact, compliant jurisdictions and decentralized ecosystems have benefited. The real variable to watch is still how the Fed handles rate cuts—everything else is just noise.