2025-12-09 18:14:27

We're heading into an era of abundance, and here's the thing – Bitcoin isn't just another asset anymore. It's become the benchmark, the hurdle rate you measure everything else against. If your investment can't beat BTC's returns, what's even the point? The game has changed.

BTC-1,72%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProveMyZK

· 2025-12-12 17:39

BTC has really become the new benchmark; other investment assets should really be trembling.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMigrant

· 2025-12-10 01:05

Bitcoin becoming the benchmark... that's true, but there are very few projects that can actually outperform it.

View OriginalReply0

InscriptionGriller

· 2025-12-09 18:42

Still putting on a brave face after taking a hit? I've seen too many shitcoins act tough before they die, and in the end, they all go to zero.

View OriginalReply0

TokenSherpa

· 2025-12-09 18:39

nah actually, let me break this down for you – if you examine the data historically speaking, benchmark frameworks have shifted before and they'll shift again. voting power dynamics in governance protocols suggest diversification still matters, empirically evidence suggests overweighting any single asset without examining tokenomics fundamentals is... let's call it suboptimal

Reply0

screenshot_gains

· 2025-12-09 18:36

The idea of Bitcoin becoming the benchmark sounds a bit absolute, but it's true that more and more people are doing this.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 2025-12-09 18:22

actually, let me pull the data here – if you're comparing risk-adjusted returns and not just raw percentages, the picture gets *way* messier. btc's volatility is brutal for the sharpe ratio calculation. seen too many people ignore basis points and correlation coefficients when they make this argument. not saying they're wrong, just... incomplete.

Reply0