Recently I've been looking into a nifty trick: a financial product with an annualized yield of 200%, which gives you 3.8% in a week.
Did some calculations—if you invest 200 USDT, after seven days you get 7.6 USDT. If you spread it across three tokens, the weekly profit goes up to 22.8 USDT (about 160 RMB). On average, that's 23 RMB credited automatically to my account every day—enough to pay for the braised pork rice downstairs.
The key move is to use hedging short positions to lock in the risk. But is this method really stable? Are there any pitfalls? Has anyone actually tested these high-yield products? Looking for some reliable evaluation criteria.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiChef
· 2025-12-12 11:56
Annualized 200%? Bro, are you gambling or investing? I find it hard to believe.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 2025-12-10 19:04
An annualized 200% sounds… you know, like you'll get into trouble someday.
A weekly 3.8% hedge short position just to stay steady? Bro, I've seen this trick too many times, and in the end, it always results in losing everything.
Earning money like this from braised pork rice is not as fast as just mining directly, really.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailed
· 2025-12-10 03:21
ngl the "kalu rice bowl math" got me... dude you're literally pricing in the exit liquidity that doesn't exist yet. seen this exact hedging setup implode three times already, technically speaking the counterparty risk alone should keep you up at night
Reply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 2025-12-09 15:45
Bro, I'm a bit confused about this math problem. Is an annualized rate of 200% equal to 3.8% per week?
If I really believed this thing could guarantee profits, I would've retired long ago—there's no such good deal in the world.
Short hedging sounds pretty professional, but at the end of the day, it's still a gamble. The risk is still there.
View OriginalReply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 2025-12-09 15:45
They even included the cost of braised pork rice—this math is something else, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter
· 2025-12-09 15:32
Bro, this number just looks off to me no matter how I look at it—an annualized 200%... Why not just write an annualized 2000% instead?
View OriginalReply0
0xSoulless
· 2025-12-09 15:31
Bro, 200% APY? That made me laugh out loud. Isn’t this just the same old pitch you hear in casinos? The thing is, the house never loses.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 2025-12-09 15:31
200% annualized? Bro, that number is obviously sketchy. If there really were such a good deal, retail investors would’ve been out of the game long ago.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 2025-12-09 15:27
200% APY? Man, that's a huge appetite. If you believe that number, you might as well believe pies can fall from the sky.
Recently I've been looking into a nifty trick: a financial product with an annualized yield of 200%, which gives you 3.8% in a week.
Did some calculations—if you invest 200 USDT, after seven days you get 7.6 USDT. If you spread it across three tokens, the weekly profit goes up to 22.8 USDT (about 160 RMB). On average, that's 23 RMB credited automatically to my account every day—enough to pay for the braised pork rice downstairs.
The key move is to use hedging short positions to lock in the risk. But is this method really stable? Are there any pitfalls? Has anyone actually tested these high-yield products? Looking for some reliable evaluation criteria.