2025-12-09 02:34:24

A certain DEX platform on the Base chain suddenly claimed that its execution efficiency for SOL transactions has reached an optimal level—even outperforming the native Solana chain at certain times. This statement is clearly a veiled jab at the leading aggregator in the Solana ecosystem. Can cross-chain liquidity really outpace the native chain? Or is this just the opening salvo of another marketing battle?

SOL-3,31%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOSapien

· 2025-12-11 20:43

Here comes the marketing talk again. Faster than the native chain? Just bragging here.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 2025-12-11 20:36

Is this the same marketing pitch again? Faster than the native chain? Haha

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 2025-12-11 13:18

Here comes another marketing battle, hilarious. Cross-chain execution efficiency surpassing that of the native chain—this sounds just like my previous NFT blue-chip "certain rebound" 💀 Are those top aggregators in the SOL ecosystem starting to get restless? On-chain data can't be fooled, if efficiency is truly optimal, DEX trading volume will speak for itself. Is this a bottoming process or just another cycle of inexperienced investors' mindset? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiEscapeArtist

· 2025-12-10 13:08

You're trying to promote some marketing gimmick again, claiming cross-chain efficiency surpasses native chains? I don't believe you.

View OriginalReply0

MemeTokenGenius

· 2025-12-09 03:04

Another stunt? Why is the DEX on Base so confident?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 2025-12-09 03:03

Here comes the marketing tactics again? Base can be faster than native Sol? What a joke, this is just the prelude to fleecing retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 2025-12-09 02:56

The consultation record shows this is another typical case of "selective data blindness" syndrome—daring to brag about beating Solana by cherry-picking a few moments of SOL network congestion? The clinical signs are obvious; this is an acute case of marketing complications. --- Low latency for cross-chain aggregation is real, but what about MEV costs, what about slippage? Only talking about execution speed without discussing the complete cost structure—I suggest this project should conduct a comprehensive health assessment report before making any further claims. --- Again? DEXs on Base make these kinds of statements all the time, but the fact is that real whales are still trading natively on Solana. Risk warning: this kind of talk is often a precursor to poor liquidity metrics. --- Ha, I remember now, last time there was another chain claiming it could beat Ethereum's gas fees—so what happened? Just marketing hype; real, hard-earned capital never lies. --- This sounds like a complication of the strategy—there is indeed arbitrage potential across chains, but how long can it last? I recommend regularly reviewing this project's actual TVL and real trading volume data.

View OriginalReply0

TestnetScholar

· 2025-12-09 02:53

Bragging again—running SOL on Base can be faster than on-chain? 🤔

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-afe07a92

· 2025-12-09 02:37

Here comes the marketing again. I've seen this trick way too many times.

View OriginalReply0