2025-12-09 02:27:14

Andrew Schulz fired back directly: You’ve never actually listened to the show, your head is just full of secondhand misconceptions.

Charlamagne hit back firmly—“I’ve been a fan for 15 years.” He then pointed out the key: people like this kind of podcast host because he can stay objective—no taking sides, no extremism.

This whole debate really highlights why certain podcast hosts maintain such massive influence in spaces like crypto and tech. Objectivity's become rare currency these days.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RiddleMaster

· 2025-12-11 16:36

ngl, I can't get the joke about being a 15-year-old fan, who can really listen that long without getting tired...

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 2025-12-11 13:03

Listening for 15 years and still getting criticized, this is really outrageous haha Which of these two is truly objective? I feel like they both sound pretty subjective The podcast scene is getting competitive, objectivity has really become a luxury Not taking sides is the hardest, but it seems this guy also hasn't fully achieved it The rumor-mongering blame everyone, but being criticized for listening for 15 years is indeed a bit harsh Things are even more outrageous in Web3, where even objectivity doesn't generate traffic, you have to take sides to make money Charlamagne's words are actually quite piercing, what does it imply? Listening to podcasts is just to avoid being scammed, but in the end, you still have to judge the truth yourself, exhausting

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 2025-12-09 02:55

Even a 15-year fan gets criticized, that's just unreasonable, haha. Listen, truly neutral moderators are indeed rare these days, but this mutual finger-pointing also shows that everyone wants to monopolize the right to speak. What the Web3 community lacks most is these unbiased voices, but every time it ends up turning into personal attacks... Ngl, these two keep debating back and forth but are still just arguing about who's more righteous—it's kind of boring. Is it really that hard to stay objective, or does no one actually want to hear the truth?

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 2025-12-09 02:47

Even a 15-year veteran fan got called out—this guy really dares, huh. Listening carefully vs. hearsay—just like that, the focus of this debate got exposed... But honestly, that "I know better than you" opener is already so overused in the podcast circle. Objectivity is indeed scarce in crypto, but sometimes "not taking sides" feels like taking a side in itself—think about it. Getting questioned after all these years of listening, and still being able to clap back—that’s exactly how a veteran fan should be, right? When it comes down to it, the influence of podcasts still relies on listener trust—breaking that trust happens faster than anything else.

View OriginalReply0

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 2025-12-09 02:43

Haha, it's ridiculous to still be questioned in 2015. Hearing rumors and then accusing others of not having heard? That's a joke. Charlamagne's words are spot on; having an objective stance is truly valuable. Seriously, everyone's taking sides these days. Podcast hosts with principles are extremely rare. Honestly, this kind of controversy only proves his influence, right?

View OriginalReply0