Here's a genius play circulating in crypto circles: find someone who just blew up on Twitter, launch a token in their name without asking, then pressure them hard to claim the protocol fees. Frame it like they're doing the ecosystem a favor with zero downside. Pure upside for their brand, right?
This playbook is getting tired. Piggyback on viral moments, tokenize someone else's fifteen minutes of fame, then guilt-trip them into participating. The pitch always sounds charitable—"help the space grow" and all that. But it's really about riding coattails while shifting responsibility onto whoever went viral. No consent needed apparently.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NftMetaversePainter
· 2025-12-11 21:15
ngl this is just parasitism with extra steps lmao. the algorithmic extraction of social capital without consent—it's antithetical to everything blockchain primitives should represent. digital sovereignty means nothing if we're just creating new vectors for exploitation
Reply0
FancyResearchLab
· 2025-12-11 14:44
Another theoretically perfect yet practically a scam innovation, Lu Ban No.7's construction idea this time is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 2025-12-10 05:22
Damn, this routine is really rotten on the street, and you know how to gather wool
View OriginalReply0
SybilSlayer
· 2025-12-09 00:10
This tactic is really ruthless, just plain unethical.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 2025-12-08 23:53
At it again? Do you really think giving people tokens is actually helping the ecosystem? What a joke, it's purely just trying to leech.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 2025-12-08 23:51
This trick is so lame, it only bullies people who aren't prepared.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 2025-12-08 23:49
Damn, this tactic is really disgusting. Not only are they riding on someone else's popularity, but they're also turning around and blaming the victim.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 2025-12-08 23:42
This kind of scam to rip off newbies is really disgusting. They just change the name and keep playing the same tricks.
Here's a genius play circulating in crypto circles: find someone who just blew up on Twitter, launch a token in their name without asking, then pressure them hard to claim the protocol fees. Frame it like they're doing the ecosystem a favor with zero downside. Pure upside for their brand, right?
This playbook is getting tired. Piggyback on viral moments, tokenize someone else's fifteen minutes of fame, then guilt-trip them into participating. The pitch always sounds charitable—"help the space grow" and all that. But it's really about riding coattails while shifting responsibility onto whoever went viral. No consent needed apparently.