South Korea's regulators are pushing a proposal that could make exchanges financially liable when user funds vanish in security breaches. If enacted, platforms would need to compensate victims directly — a rare accountability mechanism in crypto.
Meanwhile, Poland stands alone in the EU as the only member state refusing to implement MiCA regulations. Every other nation has fallen in line with the bloc's unified framework, but Warsaw's holding out.
On a different note, French banking group BPCE just greenlit crypto trading for its client base. Traditional finance continues creeping into digital assets, one institution at a time.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 2025-12-09 20:41
South Korea is ruthless with this move, making trading gains take the blame? Feels like the crypto world is about to start bleeding...
Poland is still holding on, pretty interesting, just not sure how long they can last.
Traditional finance in France is still trying to get in, seems like it really can't be stopped.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 2025-12-09 03:16
South Korea is trying to build a credit endorsement here, but I think it’ll be tough to implement. There’s no way exchanges would willingly take the fall...
Wait, Poland’s move is ruthless—it's the only one in the entire EU not cooperating. The MACD just made a golden cross.
In France, traditional finance has opened the floodgates. That’s a real bullish signal, much more substantial than any policy.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 2025-12-08 21:07
South Korea's move is brilliant—are exchanges going to take the fall? Finally, someone dares to take real action. Let's see if this mess can actually be implemented...
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 2025-12-08 21:06
South Korea is demanding exchanges to compensate users this time? Feels like they're trying to dress up exchange funds as an "insurance smart contract" [dog head]... but who will oversee the liquidity for these payouts?
Is Poland still resisting MiCA? Truly an outlier in the EU, sooner or later they'll be collectively condemned.
French banks are opening up to crypto trading; traditional finance is finally getting serious... But honestly, is this really the last straw against inflation or just another round of cash grabbing? Let's see the data before making a judgment.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKing
· 2025-12-08 20:55
This move by South Korea is really tough—are exchanges going to take the blame and compensate for losses? It sounds good, but how it will actually be implemented is another question.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 2025-12-08 20:46
South Korea's move is ruthless—losing money on trading profits? Finally, someone dares to take action...
Poland's move is incredible, a single country standing up to the entire EU—who else would dare to be so tough?
How much longer until traditional finance completely erodes crypto...
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 2025-12-08 20:41
Damn, Korea is ruthless with this move. If exchanges really have to pay compensation, some platforms are going to be scared shitless.
Weekend wrap: Three policy shifts worth noting.
South Korea's regulators are pushing a proposal that could make exchanges financially liable when user funds vanish in security breaches. If enacted, platforms would need to compensate victims directly — a rare accountability mechanism in crypto.
Meanwhile, Poland stands alone in the EU as the only member state refusing to implement MiCA regulations. Every other nation has fallen in line with the bloc's unified framework, but Warsaw's holding out.
On a different note, French banking group BPCE just greenlit crypto trading for its client base. Traditional finance continues creeping into digital assets, one institution at a time.