When you encounter this kind of error, it usually takes at least an hour to resolve.



Looking at their design, they intend to use their own interface to broadcast all on-chain transactions. But after going through the code, there’s no requirement for users to sign directly with their wallet (probably to prevent bypassing them through private RPCs). By this logic, the platform should be covering the transaction fees, right? But in reality, the fee payer is still set to the user's address.

This is awkward—the user hasn't signed, so how can they authorize the fee deduction? The transaction just can't be sent out.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 2025-12-11 18:47
This design is really clever, both sides are traps.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictimvip
· 2025-12-11 13:07
Typical rug pull signs, digging your own grave and filling it yourself
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 2025-12-10 05:08
This design is really amazing, and you can jump the hole you dig
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFTvip
· 2025-12-08 19:52
This logical flaw is unbelievable, a typical case of "wanting it all." The platform wants to monopolize the broadcast channel but doesn't want to pay for it themselves. Where are users supposed to get the signature to authorize the deduction?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 2025-12-08 19:52
This design flaw is incredible, a typical case of wanting to have your cake and eat it too.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapyvip
· 2025-12-08 19:46
This design flaw is way too obvious, it's unbelievable... The fee payer is still pointing to the user's address? How are they supposed to deduct the fee?
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphetvip
· 2025-12-08 19:36
This logical flaw is really something else. The platform wants to take all the profits but still expects users to foot the bill?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037vip
· 2025-12-08 19:34
This design is problematic: the fee payer is set to the user's address, but doesn't allow them to sign. Isn't that contradictory?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)