2025-12-08 13:25:18

Last week, I tried wash trading on a certain liquidity trading platform and gave Lighter protocol a shot. To my surprise, the points awarded were pitifully low, which left me feeling a bit dissatisfied.

After thinking it over this week, I decided to go back to HL. In the early stages, exchanging some wear-and-tear costs for points seems like a reasonable trade-off to me. After all, early participation in a project often comes with higher weighting coefficients.

Of course, everyone has a different risk appetite. Some people like to diversify and test the waters, while others prefer to focus their efforts. There’s no standard answer when it comes to strategy—what works best is what suits you. Make sure to do your own research and don’t blindly follow the crowd.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RiddleMaster

· 2025-12-11 02:41

HL's points are indeed more attractive, and Lighter's scraping is not great. Early-stage full commitment is the key, the weight coefficients are way off. But ultimately, it depends on personal risk tolerance; I just prefer betting on top projects. Doing your own research is the most important, don't just listen to my rambling. Early entrants are all laughing at latecomers. The HL ecosystem is worth deep involvement.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 2025-12-09 10:12

The cost of slippage depends on how the project sets the pricing; sometimes it’s just not worth it. --- The points for Lighter are really underwhelming; the weighting coefficient at HL is what really matters. --- Getting involved early is basically betting on how the project team will distribute things later—there’s no guarantee. --- Focusing all your efforts vs. spreading out and testing the waters—at the end of the day, it’s about how bold you are. --- What’s cost-effective for others might not be for you; you still have to do your own math. --- This move sounds nice in theory, but in reality, it’s just going all in and taking a gamble. --- Swapping slippage for points on HL is honestly way more fair than what some other projects offer. --- Different risk preferences, sure, but losing money feels just as bad for everyone. --- Weighting coefficients sound great, but in the end, it all comes down to how much you actually get in dividends. --- Doing your own research is right, but sometimes luck plays an even bigger role.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 2025-12-08 13:55

Damn, Lighter's points are way too stingy, it's really not worth the hassle. The early HL weight coefficient was definitely better, I think it was worth exchanging some wear and tear for points. But at the end of the day, it really depends on how much risk you can handle, there's no need to go all in on just one.

View OriginalReply0

BearEatsAll

· 2025-12-08 13:50

Yeah, Lighter's points are really stingy. I tried it once and never went back. HL is still HL, you have to invest early on to get better weight, the ROI later isn't much different. Don't blindly follow the crowd, doing your own calculations is what matters most. Everyone has their own strategies, there's no need for uniformity. Consider the wear and tear costs as tuition, it's much better than blindly farming everything.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 2025-12-08 13:48

actually... the whole "points allocation" thing here is kinda glossing over the real problem, no? like, have you actually audited the smart contract logic for how these protocols calculate rewards? because imho most folks just chase whatever distributes tokens fastest without understanding the underlying trust assumptions lol

Reply0

ForkYouPayMe

· 2025-12-08 13:36

Haha, the points for Lighter are really pathetic. HL is still more reliable. Early participation means you have to all in on one. This round, HL's weight coefficient is really top-notch. Bet on the early pool. Lighter's points got delayed, I'm speechless. Early HL players really made a killing, no regrets going all in. Those who diversified to test the waters, just wait to get rekt, lol. You still need to find your own rhythm; you can't copy other people's success. In this HL track, you have to focus your efforts. Retail investor mentality will ruin you.

View OriginalReply0