#比特币对比代币化黄金 Tokenized gold sounds good, but the problem lies with the issuer—who can guarantee that they’re always holding the corresponding amount of gold? With these kinds of financial schemes, the risk of the operators running off with the money is always the biggest variable. To put it bluntly, credit risk is always hanging over your head. In contrast, $BTC is different; it truly belongs to you and doesn’t rely on any third party. Plus, Bitcoin has already achieved widespread consensus and its recognition is on par with, if not better than, gold. From this perspective, the road to tokenizing crypto assets still has a long way to go, and the risk management isn’t nearly as reassuring as simply holding native blockchain assets directly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
rugged_again
· 2025-12-11 07:31
It's the same old story... Equating tokenized gold with Ponzi schemes is overthinking it.
Holding the native asset is more straightforward, with fewer complications.
BTC is the way to go; don't mess around.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 2025-12-10 18:31
Haha, alright, another story about trusting me and not trusting anything else... That's true, tokenized gold is just a gamble that the issuer won't run away. I've seen this happen too many times.
But to be honest, I do believe in the "completely yours" logic of Bitcoin, even if you lose the private key, you're still screwed... That's how I got caught.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoer
· 2025-12-08 10:30
Tokenized gold? Ha, no thanks. I trust BTC, not the issuers.
View OriginalReply0
InscriptionGriller
· 2025-12-08 10:19
Tokenized gold? Uh... it's just a rebranded Ponzi scheme, and you still have to trust the issuer. What a joke.
---
BTC is the real deal—control your own keys, keep your own money, that's true freedom.
---
To put it bluntly: anything centralized will eventually collapse, on-chain is the only way.
---
The day the issuer runs away, tokenized gold becomes just a string of characters. I'm not taking that bet.
---
With so many scams in crypto, people still believe in tokenized gold? Bro, you're too naive.
---
Why not just hold BTC directly? Why insist on trusting some third party you know nothing about?
---
Another contestant on the road to eternal zero... I really don't get tokenized gold.
View OriginalReply0
ForumLurker
· 2025-12-08 10:14
Tokenized gold? To put it nicely, it's innovation; to put it bluntly, it's just another layer of middlemen. I still trust BTC a bit more—at least no one can run away with it.
View OriginalReply0
NeverVoteOnDAO
· 2025-12-08 10:11
Tokenized gold is like putting a noose around your own neck—trusting a third party? Yeah, right.
#比特币对比代币化黄金 Tokenized gold sounds good, but the problem lies with the issuer—who can guarantee that they’re always holding the corresponding amount of gold? With these kinds of financial schemes, the risk of the operators running off with the money is always the biggest variable. To put it bluntly, credit risk is always hanging over your head. In contrast, $BTC is different; it truly belongs to you and doesn’t rely on any third party. Plus, Bitcoin has already achieved widespread consensus and its recognition is on par with, if not better than, gold. From this perspective, the road to tokenizing crypto assets still has a long way to go, and the risk management isn’t nearly as reassuring as simply holding native blockchain assets directly.