2025-12-08 08:05:09

After his social media platform got slapped with a hefty $140 million penalty, a prominent tech billionaire publicly demanded the dissolution of the European Union. The fine stems from ongoing regulatory battles between the platform and EU authorities over content moderation policies. This escalating clash highlights the deepening tension between major tech players and regulatory bodies—a friction point that's increasingly relevant to the crypto and Web3 space, where platforms frequently butt heads with government oversight. The executive's explosive response signals just how far Silicon Valley moguls are willing to push back against what they view as regulatory overreach. Whether you see it as a justified defense of free expression or a reckless attack on democratic institutions, this confrontation underscores a broader struggle: how much control should governments wield over digital platforms in an increasingly decentralized world?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainDoctor

· 2025-12-10 20:22

He really takes the 1.4 billion fine seriously, then turns around and wants to break up the EU? This guy really dares to say that. Still a member of the Celestial Dragons, when regulated he freaks out and demands dissolution. We all understand the rules here in Web3, but this brother genuinely hasn't thought it through. Feeling like playing a bad hand into a winning hand, and honestly, his logic is the same as some shitcoin's pre-dump statements. The EU says he's not capable, and he responds that the EU is the one at fault. When will this back-and-forth end? Silicon Valley folks really think they've been chosen by the day, hilarious. People in the crypto space also dislike over-regulation, but none are as outrageous as him.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 2025-12-10 20:16

A fine of 140 million is enough to call for dissolving the EU? This guy's sustainability strategy is really problematic. --- Honestly, the government regulation and platform freedom incentive balance point has not been found at all. Web3 is facing the same dilemma. --- This kind of action against the EU, luckily it’s not in the crypto circle, otherwise the community would have torn apart. --- Fines lead to political confrontation, ROI efficiency scores zero. It’s a bit like the套路 of cutting leeks project—losing money and then shifting blame. --- What do players care about for retention? Whether the platform can survive for five years. If this old guy keeps doing this, the risk factor will soar. --- These folks in Silicon Valley really, often throwing around the big tech name as a shield, but deep down their logic is no different from cutting leeks. --- So the fundamental question is: in a decentralized world, who will do the market clearing? It can’t be just opposing regulation blindly.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 2025-12-08 08:35

A 140 million fine... Wait, I need to check the on-chain flow of this money. Feels like a whale is manipulating this behind the scenes. Dissolve the EU? This guy’s really bold, but come to think of it, isn’t this also some institutions testing the boundaries of regulation? With the EU’s heavy blow, why have other Web3 platform wallet addresses been so active these past couple of days? Coincidence? I don’t think so. Careful, this could be creating public opinion cover for even bigger black-box operations. To put it bluntly, the whales can’t beat regulation, so now they’re shifting the blame to the “system”—same old trick. Fund flows can really tell the story. How were those 140 million transferred? I have to check the suspicious wallet cluster interactions. This isn’t that simple—there’s definitely some backend data I haven’t uncovered yet. Instead of talking politics, it’s better to focus on who’s taking the opportunity to move assets. That’s the real point, bro. Another regulatory dispute? Why do I feel like this is just a smokescreen for some large transfer anomalies?

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 2025-12-08 08:32

A 14 billion fine broke his defenses instantly—this guy really thinks he's the emperor.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleShadow

· 2025-12-08 08:28

$140 million? Ha, this guy really dares to speak his mind—he even goes so far as to talk about breaking up the EU.

View OriginalReply0