Word's getting around about a new directive from Washington that could shake up the content moderation landscape. Apparently, the current administration wants to put the brakes on U.S. visa applications for anyone who's worked as a fact-checker or content moderator overseas.



A leaked State Department memo is telling embassies to dig into applicants' backgrounds—specifically looking for any history of involvement in what they're calling "censorship" activities. It's a pretty broad net they're casting.

This move raises questions beyond immigration policy. For those of us watching the decentralized tech space, it touches on larger debates about who controls information flow and what constitutes legitimate content governance versus actual censorship. The crypto community has always been sensitive to these boundaries, given how centralized platforms have historically handled discussions around digital assets.

Whether this policy shift will have practical enforcement teeth or if it's more of a symbolic stance remains to be seen. But it's definitely a signal about the administration's position on content moderation practices—something worth keeping an eye on as these debates increasingly intersect with Web3 development and decentralized communication platforms.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetectivevip
· 2025-12-11 05:08
nah this reeks of orchestrated pressure. watch the transaction flows when visa rejections start—there's always a pattern before the official narrative drops
Reply0
OldLeekNewSicklevip
· 2025-12-11 03:44
Ha... this is about reclaiming the right to define "speech regulation," quite a good story.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 2025-12-11 00:36
Haha, another one? When it comes to controlling the flow of information, we crypto folks understand it best. Just like a liquidation, bump into a risk point and it's instant liquidation.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterNoLossvip
· 2025-12-08 05:54
Damn, is this a disguised way to purge crypto-friendly professionals...
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 2025-12-08 05:54
LOL, check the fact-checker? This guy really sees freedom of speech as a bad thing. --- Wait, isn't this just another way of purging dissenters, just under the banner of anti-censorship? --- Web3 is the real way out. If we use it, these bureaucrats can't control our right to speak. --- Huh? So now telling the truth also gets you censored? How ironic. --- There's no way this policy will actually be enforced. It's just for show. --- Sigh, what they're doing in the name of anti-censorship is still censorship—just old wine in a new bottle. --- Wow, they're just flipping the whole idea of internet governance on its head. --- Could this be paving the way for decentralized communication platforms? --- Speech censorship has never stopped; they've just switched departments.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickstervip
· 2025-12-08 05:45
Ha, now this is getting interesting. By blacklisting all the fact-checkers, the information independence of Web3 becomes even more valuable.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 2025-12-08 05:41
Ha, it's really happening this time. Freedom of speech is about to be restricted again.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 2025-12-08 05:40
Damn, this policy is really outrageous. Even fact-checkers are going to be banned? Isn't this just an attempt to control the narrative?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)