2025-12-08 01:22:37

LUNC and another asset have both recently pulled back from their highs. What’s particularly noteworthy is that the contract open interest on the day LUNC peaked was almost identical to the data from the two tops in Q1 last year—each time, when open interest piled up to this level, a sharp correction followed immediately.

History doesn’t repeat itself exactly, but it often rhymes. If the price manages to rebound again, I think there’s still room for another trade. But this time, a safety net is necessary: set the stop loss right at the recent rally’s high, around 0.000080. After all, the numbers tell the story—respecting the market is more reliable than betting on luck.

LUNC0,11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 2025-12-10 23:45

This position data is indeed a bit extreme, hitting the mark so precisely every time is a bit scary. However, I think the stop loss at 0.000080 is a bit tight; historical rhymes don't necessarily mean a complete copy. LUNC still needs to be observed further; it feels like it hasn't fully played out yet.

View OriginalReply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 2025-12-10 22:02

Position data is so consistent, it's really impressive. I respect the saying about historical rhymes. --- 0.000080 is a support level that must hold, or else you'll face a loss. --- The data is right here, so you have to trust it. Betting on luck is just reckless. --- Every time, stacking positions and then smashing, will this time be different? --- Thoughtful safety nets, not like some people going all-in impulsively. --- By the way, are contract data really that accurate? Sometimes it feels like it's misleading. --- It's okay to gamble again, but mental preparation must be in place, don't ruin it. --- Wait, this pattern has repeated three times? The risk is indeed significant.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 2025-12-08 01:52

The open interest data here is indeed interesting; historical patterns are there for reference. But we still need to be cautious—just make sure to hold the line at 0.000080.

View OriginalReply0

GovernancePretender

· 2025-12-08 01:43

Open interest data is indeed interesting, but it feels like the same story is being repeated every time. I'm numb to it.

View OriginalReply0

LineaWhale