Regulatory drama unfolds: EU Commission slapped a certain social platform with a €120M fine over transparency issues, then got caught exploiting an ad system loophole to artificially inflate video metrics. The platform responded by terminating their ad account and patching the vulnerability. The irony? An authority punishing others for lack of transparency while gaming engagement numbers themselves. This incident raises questions about who monitors the monitors in decentralized platform governance.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWatcher
· 2025-12-09 16:04
This is hilarious. The enforcer cheats themselves but punishes others first—what an unbelievable move.
View OriginalReply0
MultiSigFailMaster
· 2025-12-08 08:35
This is ridiculous; the regulators themselves are the first to break the rules.
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 2025-12-08 00:50
Haha, what a slap in the face. Accusing others of being non-transparent while cheating themselves—this EU is just too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 2025-12-08 00:49
Ha, this is awkward... The EU is slapping itself in the face? Fining others for transparency, yet playing with data manipulation outside the rules themselves. Hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerForever
· 2025-12-08 00:45
LOL, the regulatory authorities are already playing themselves before the platforms even get a turn.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 2025-12-08 00:34
Damn, the regulators themselves are cheating? How ironic is that.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 2025-12-08 00:28
So funny, the admins themselves are manipulating data, yet they still have the nerve to punish others.
Regulatory drama unfolds: EU Commission slapped a certain social platform with a €120M fine over transparency issues, then got caught exploiting an ad system loophole to artificially inflate video metrics. The platform responded by terminating their ad account and patching the vulnerability. The irony? An authority punishing others for lack of transparency while gaming engagement numbers themselves. This incident raises questions about who monitors the monitors in decentralized platform governance.