2025-12-07 21:00:19

#美SEC促进加密资产创新监管框架 A major signal was recently released by US regulators—an SEC executive publicly stated that the entire US financial market could move on-chain within two years.

Does that sound a bit crazy? But if you think about it, traditional financial institutions have been making frequent moves over the past two years. From BlackRock applying for a $BTC spot ETF to major banks testing stablecoin settlements, the maturity of on-chain infrastructure is visibly improving.

Two years is not a long time, but it’s not short either. If things really progress at this pace, it means stocks, bonds, derivatives—all these will need a redefinition of the rules of the game. Decentralized ledgers, smart contracts, real-time settlement… concepts that used to exist only in the crypto world might soon become the norm on Wall Street.

Of course, the shift in regulatory attitude is the most crucial factor. In the past, it was strict defense; now, they’re starting to embrace it. The logic behind this change might be the real point to watch. The market is already voting with its feet; now, it’s up to the implementation side to keep up with expectations.

BTC0,14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TopBuyerBottomSeller

· 2025-12-09 07:15

Two years? Dream on, that's not going to happen at this pace. Talk is cheap, execution is what really matters. This move from the SEC is just a rumor, let's wait and see. Can those Wall Street dinosaurs really accept on-chain? Hilarious. BlackRock moves fast, while other institutions are still on the sidelines. Has regulation really changed its stance? I'm still a bit skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropBlackHole

· 2025-12-08 17:52

Move on-chain in two years? This SEC guy must be drunk, haha. If Wall Street really moves on-chain, I’ll go all-in, but I bet five bucks the execution level can drag it out for five years. This time is different—BlackRock is already in. If you can’t understand what’s coming next, that’s actually the risky part. It all sounds nice, but in the end, the regulators will just change their stance again, pulling back and forth as usual.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 2025-12-07 21:29

Why does it feel like moving finance on-chain has become inevitable in the past two years? BlackRock makes a move and Wall Street follows suit, hilarious. Is that for real, getting it done in two years? I bet five bucks it’ll take at least three. Wait, if that’s the case, stablecoins are really about to take off—I need to increase my position. By the way, the SEC suddenly changing its stance makes me wonder if they’re holding back some big move. Sounds nice, but it’s just the market forcing their hand; weren’t they against it before?

View OriginalReply0

SignatureVerifier

· 2025-12-07 21:26

tbh this "two years" timeline is statistically improbable without addressing fundamental validation gaps first. SEC talking points ≠ actual infrastructure readiness. where's the security audit for large-scale smart contract deployment across derivatives markets? insufficient testing threshold detected. trust but verify, fr.

Reply0

NftDeepBreather

· 2025-12-07 21:24

Two years? idk, feels like they're bragging again, but BlackRock is really tough this time. Wait, is Wall Street really going to use our stuff? Kind of ironic, haha. Regulators changing their stance this fast? Honestly, it's all about the money. Alright then, let's just wait to get rekt, everyone. Is it for real this time, or is it just another "boy who cried wolf" situation?

View OriginalReply0