Calling regulations a simple cause-and-effect formula? That's missing the point entirely.
Want real growth? You're dealing with scaling populations and complexity that multiplies exponentially.
Bureaucracy emerges as a consequence of that growth—it's not the root cause. It's the system adapting to manage what expansion creates.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 2025-12-10 20:34
Honestly, regulation is inherently a false proposition; are you really going to blame it for hindering growth?
As the population increases and matters become more complex, the system naturally expands—do you want that or not?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6c
· 2025-12-07 21:04
That's right, it's not regulation that kills innovation; the system just needs to expand and adapt accordingly.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 2025-12-07 21:02
To put it simply, the rules aren't the problem; it's having too many people that's the issue.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 2025-12-07 20:45
That's right, regulation and bureaucracy are not a straightforward one-to-one causal relationship. Many people do oversimplify this issue.
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 2025-12-07 20:34
To put it simply, treating regulation as a simple formula? That logic is honestly terrible.
Calling regulations a simple cause-and-effect formula? That's missing the point entirely.
Want real growth? You're dealing with scaling populations and complexity that multiplies exponentially.
Bureaucracy emerges as a consequence of that growth—it's not the root cause. It's the system adapting to manage what expansion creates.