2025-12-07 15:30:27

Here's something worth thinking about: a Twitch creator with 7 million followers just proved that deep audience connection translates directly into serious money.

Emily Schunk didn't rely on a single revenue channel. She built a diversified income engine—streaming sessions, podcast episodes, carefully selected brand partnerships. Last year? Roughly $1.5 million in earnings.

Why does this matter for Web3? Because the same principle applies: genuine community engagement isn't just vanity metrics. It's measurable enterprise value. Whether you're building on Twitch or launching a decentralized protocol, the math stays consistent—loyalty converts to revenue when you offer real value across multiple touchpoints.

The traditional creator economy already figured this out. Web3 projects should be taking notes.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenUnlocker

· 2025-12-10 14:23

To be honest, this logic is a bit ironic for Web3... Traditional creators have already figured it out, and we're still here yap about decentralization.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 2025-12-09 12:14

$15 million in revenue—what decentralization is Web3 still hyping? Traditional creators have already won.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-c799715c

· 2025-12-07 15:59

To be honest, this logic has been known in Web3 for a long time; it's just that the execution has been really weak...

View OriginalReply0

AirDropMissed

· 2025-12-07 15:59

Nah, this is exactly why those Web3 projects that rely on a single channel always end up failing.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOrektGuy

· 2025-12-07 15:57

This is what Web3 should be learning—stop messing around with useless tokens.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticLayer

· 2025-12-07 15:45

ngl this is exactly what Web3 projects have never figured out—they just build communities without monetizing... --- Multi-channel monetization is the real way to go; relying on a single source of income is too fragile. --- 1.5 million... this is what it means to truly understand the value of your own community. --- While Web3 is still hyping up community consensus, others are already doing the math. --- The problem is that Web3 projects simply don’t have the execution ability that Emily has. --- That’s why loyal fans > traffic numbers—this logic holds true anywhere. --- Most Web3 projects are still selling dreams, while others are already cashing in. --- This is what real commercialization looks like, no need to overcomplicate it.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 2025-12-07 15:40

To be honest, just having a lot of followers is useless; the key is having the ability to monetize... Emily really knows how to work this multi-channel revenue system. Meanwhile, over in Web3, they're still yapping about community consensus and haven't grasped this point at all.

View OriginalReply0