I've been following the Rally project recently—not because of any hype, but simply because I think what they're doing seems pretty solid.



Most projects in the Web3 space still stick to the same old playbook: recruiting people and boosting exposure, with the loudest ones getting the most rewards. Honestly, this approach is exhausting for users and for project teams alike.

Rally is a bit different. They've integrated AI technology into their incentive system, moving away from the crude method of calculating contributions by headcount, and instead are aiming for a more accurate way to identify real value. Although we'll have to wait and see how the actual implementation works out, at least the concept is heading in the right direction—making sure those who truly contribute get recognized, rather than just rewarding those who make the most noise.

This kind of attempt is actually much needed in the current environment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForumMiningMastervip
· 19h ago
Alright, this approach is indeed fresh, but there’s still a question mark when it comes to AI’s ability to recognize value. Hold on, can Rally’s mechanism really prevent wash trading? Feels like we’ll have to see it in action. It does seem reliable, but I’m just worried it might turn out to be another PPT project. It sounds good, but the key is whether there will be real execution later on. Compared to those who just shout slogans, this is indeed worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetectivevip
· 19h ago
Oh, finally someone sees it clearly. Most projects are just IQ taxes. By the way, has Rally’s AI value recognition logic... really been implemented? This is what Web3 is supposed to look like. But I still want to see the actual data. Another project that sounds good, but we’ll have to wait and see. Honestly, there are very few who actually dare to do real work these days. The logic makes sense, but how many can really execute it well? Having been burned before, I’m not too trusting anymore. There’s too much hype, let the data speak for itself. Agreed, but no matter how well the incentive mechanism is designed, it still depends on who executes it.
View OriginalReply0
LightningWalletvip
· 20h ago
This AI approach to recognizing real value is indeed quite interesting, definitely better than those pure money-grabbing schemes. In the end, it still depends on actual implementation—hopefully it’s not just another “PPT token.” But at least someone is trying to change this rotten referral-based logic, so there’s finally a bit of hope. Wait, how exactly does their AI determine contributions? Is it just another black box? I’ll need to pay more attention to this Rally project. If they can really get the incentive mechanism right, this is the path Web3 should be taking.
View OriginalReply0
MetadataExplorervip
· 20h ago
Uh, it's not that mysterious, right? I've heard the whole AI identifying value thing quite a few times. The key is whether it can actually be executed properly. I'm just worried that in the end, it'll become another way to fleece retail investors... How do you define real value? Who gets to decide? That's the core issue, isn't it? But I do admit Rally is trying to do something different, so I'm watching for now. I'm a bit curious about what their specific data model looks like.
View OriginalReply0
MoonWaterDropletsvip
· 20h ago
Yeah, that's true. Compared to those who shout slogans every day, people who actually get things done are the real deal. --- As for AI value recognition, let's see how they tune the parameters going forward. Hopefully it won't just become another black box. --- Finally, someone isn't relying on recruiting others to survive. This is what Web3 should really look like. --- Wait, can their AI mechanism really prevent Sybil attacks? Or is it just old wine in a new bottle? --- Honestly, this kind of approach is a breath of fresh air in the current environment, but we'll have to let the data speak for itself. --- Compared to those projects that promise 100x returns at the drop of a hat, something solid like this is actually more reassuring. --- Sounds good, but the key is whether they can really execute. Too many projects die at the implementation stage. --- It's interesting, but I'll reserve judgment for now. Let's see what they do next. --- Feels like I've found a project that's not so full of tricks, which is kind of rare. --- The problem is the market doesn't care about value recognition at all. It only cares about hype and liquidity. That's the reality.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 20h ago
Ironically, every time I hear "a more precise way to identify real value," I think of all those projects from the last bull run that died—they all said the same thing. The data speaks for itself. Just look at how many projects claiming to "revolutionize incentive systems" ended up as copy-paste jobs in the end. I'll bet five bucks that once Rally's mechanism is implemented, it won't escape this cycle either. That said, at least projects bold enough to explore this direction are indeed rare. The only question is how long the AI boost can last. What's interesting is that the ones who talk the best game usually crash the hardest.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)