2025-12-07 14:26:49

Recently in the market, tokens designed like YFSX have become quite rare.

Its core logic is extreme: the total supply is already low, and it implements a 100% deflationary burn mechanism. What does that mean? It means that with every transaction and every movement, the circulating supply is permanently reduced. With this kind of approach, the token only becomes harder and harder to acquire, and price sensitivity naturally reaches its peak.

Looking at the team’s recent actions, their direction is very clear—they are fully committed to the “scarcity + mechanism-driven” route. Simply put, they are betting on this logic: when the available tokens become scarce enough, market sentiment will ferment on its own.

However, it’s worth noting that such an extreme deflationary model also carries risks. If liquidity is too poor, you may not be able to exit even if you get in.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletWhisperer

· 2025-12-10 11:23

100% deflationary is truly absolute, but I'm just worried no one will buy the dip when it crashes. I've heard too many stories about getting in but not getting out. Will this time be another case of scarcity hype? It sounds uncertain; we still need to see if liquidity is strong enough. I've never seen this mechanism before, it's really a gamble on human nature. How much can emotional fermentation really be worth? The less supply, the higher the price? That’s the ideal scenario, but what about in reality?

View OriginalReply0

SneakyFlashloan

· 2025-12-08 11:10

100% deflationary? Sounds like a trap—easy to get in, hard to get out. --- I'm tired of hearing about scarcity mechanisms. In the end, it's always a game of passing the bag. --- If liquidity is so poor that you can't exit, it's pointless. Don't talk to me about hype or sentiment. --- The team is gambling? Looks to me like they're just betting on who will be the last fool. --- Every transaction gets burned—how long do you have to burn before there's any profit? That's just absurd.

View OriginalReply0

ApeShotFirst

· 2025-12-07 14:55

Damn, this design is really brilliant. 100% deflationary? Easy to get in, hard to get out—this is basically a gamble.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 2025-12-07 14:52

Wait, can this 100% deflation really be implemented? I feel like it could easily turn into a dead coin.

View OriginalReply0

SeeYouInFourYears

· 2025-12-07 14:47

This mechanism looks great on the surface, but when it comes time to dump, you'll understand what a liquidity trap really is. 100% deflation sounds intense, but in reality, it's just betting on the next bag holder. The tighter the supply, the easier it is to crash. If you don't believe it, just look at history. It's easy to get in but hard to get out—this is the real truth. When deflation reaches the extreme, it's time to reflect. Things always reverse when pushed to the limit, you know?

View OriginalReply0

BrokenDAO

· 2025-12-07 14:46

It's the same old scarcity magic again... The eve before liquidity death is always the most enticing. I've seen too many such designs die from their own mechanisms.

View OriginalReply0