2025-12-07 10:27:41

Here's how this is likely to play out: a certain co-founder of a leading exchange will come out first to respond to the progress of the investigation. Right after that, the big shot from OKLink will definitely make some sarcastic remarks—after all, it wouldn't be his style not to take a jab at times like this. Then, big brother CZ probably won't be able to sit still either, and might respond with a tweet.

With this back-and-forth, the buzz will only get hotter, and there might be even more drama to follow. The crypto world has never been short on theatrics; once the web of personal relationships gets tense, the story just keeps going.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoSurvivor

· 2025-12-10 06:12

Haha laughed to death, this routine has long been tired of watching, whoever jumps out first will lose CZ is really unbearable this time, I bet five U he has to tweet today Ocona buddies must be gearing up behind them, just waiting to step on it The drama in the currency circle will never end, everyone These people pierce each other's hearts every day, and I am really addicted to it Maybe there will be more fierce revelations waiting in the future, continue to eat melons

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 2025-12-08 11:37

Alright, alright, here we go again with everyone shifting the blame. This kind of drama in the crypto space just keeps repeating 365 days a year. CZ tweets, that guy from OK mocks sarcastically, and then it's endless twists and turns. I'm just quietly watching. Who's got the biggest scoop this time? Maybe all the effort will end up being for nothing again. It's the same routine every day—other than the hype going up, nothing ever changes. I just want to ask, who will actually be the final winner this time?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 2025-12-07 10:57

Just waiting for the big shots to expose each other—this script is more exciting than a novel. CZ moves fast, probably already blowing up Twitter, and the OK Group guy definitely won't back down either. That's how the crypto world is—one piece of gossip leads to ten more, and it just never stops. At times like this, the best position is to just watch and enjoy the show, don't get involved. Seriously, it's always the same routine: things heat up to the max and then there's a reversal, and the cycle repeats.

View OriginalReply0

LightningSentry

· 2025-12-07 10:57

Haha, this script is all too familiar. There's never a shortage of drama in the crypto world. CZ definitely can't hold back, just waiting to see the tweets. As for OKX, tsk tsk, they love to jump on the hype at times like this. Just waiting for the next twist, feels like the drama isn't over yet. The situation is getting more and more intense, interesting. To be honest, whoever comes out first loses. It's all about who can hold out the longest. There's never a shortage of stories in crypto, just a shortage of juicy ones.

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 2025-12-07 10:38

Ha, here we go again? As soon as CZ tweets, I know there’s going to be big drama. Just waiting for everyone to start shifting blame—honestly, it’s so easy to watch the show this time. That guy from OKX definitely can’t hold back right now, he has to take a jab to feel satisfied. There’s never a shortage of infighting in crypto, I’m honestly tired of it. The real question is when CZ will make a move, so I can decide whose side to take. A three-way battle—it’s actually pretty interesting, just waiting for the plot twist. This storyline is well written, even more exciting than some project whitepapers. Feels like everyone’s just waiting for someone else to slip up—the first to crash loses. At the end of the day, it’s just a fight for attention, everyone’s just trying to ride the hype.

View OriginalReply0