2025-12-07 10:22:38

Discovered an interesting time discrepancy.

A project's official Twitter account posted an announcement at 13:30:00, but on-chain data shows that the same address created and withdrew BNB as early as 13:21, and completed the token issuance at 13:29:45.

What's even more striking is that this batch of BNB ultimately flowed into a deposit address at a certain exchange.

From withdrawal to token issuance to the official announcement, the entire process was timed with incredible precision. This 9-minute time gap, combined with the sequence of on-chain operations, makes things seem a bit suspicious.

On-chain data doesn't lie, and timestamps are solid evidence. If the project team is truly confident, why not come out and explain this unusual operation?

BNB1,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-beba108d

· 2025-12-10 10:19

It's the same old operation again. Being off by just seconds in 9 minutes clearly indicates what. --- This is a typical pattern of rushing to go offline before the official announcement, and the on-chain data is right there. --- Wait, from 13:21 to 13:29:45, then an announcement at 13:30? This timing is just too "coincidental". --- That move of transferring to the exchange deposit address is really brilliant. It’s hard not to think more. --- Project team, come out and clarify. This timing was so tight, it could have been a plane takeoff. --- Another shell game operation. The on-chain data is so clear, yet they still dare to pretend they don’t see. --- Completing the transition from token issuance to official announcement in 9 minutes, with such high efficiency—why not go build rockets? --- This is exactly the standard operation process of a "mouse warehouse" (small-scale insider trading). There’s really no concealment at all.

View OriginalReply0

HodlOrRegret

· 2025-12-09 23:38

Sold in 9 minutes, and the official announcement only came after? Classic insider operation. --- This trick is all too familiar—act first, promote later. They might as well write "scam retail investors" on their faces. --- On-chain timestamps are solid proof. Projects that are still trying to deny it are truly unbelievable. --- Exchange deposit address... I don't even need to say it, you all know what's going on. --- It's outrageous—they really dare to commit crimes directly on-chain.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticLayer

· 2025-12-08 14:33

Another time-gap master, got himself all worked up within 9 minutes, haha.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 2025-12-08 03:15

Same old trick again, finishing all operations in 9 minutes is really insane. --- The on-chain data is right there, you can't make up lies. --- This is a typical case of acting first and announcing later, insiders have already run away. --- I just want to see how the project team will spin this lie. --- I've seen this kind of time gap operation too many times, every time it's the retail investors left holding the bag. --- Exchange deposit address, huh, everything is clear now. --- From 13 minutes to 29 minutes and 45 seconds, Schrödinger-style operation precise to the second. --- If you have the guts, come and clarify. If not, just keep playing dead. --- The on-chain timestamp can't be changed, that's solid evidence. --- Another perfect rug pull tutorial case.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 2025-12-07 10:52

Cashing out and running in 9 minutes, that's some serious skill. Same old story, official Twitter speaks softly while on-chain they've already vanished. Honestly, when the timing is this precise, there's basically no need to follow up. Unbelievable, BNB sent straight to the exchange deposit address—this script is well written. The on-chain data is right there, and they still dare to call themselves a project team.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 2025-12-07 10:52

9 mins to dump, announce, repeat. classic pump pattern tbh, timestamps don't lie and neither does the chain

Reply0

TradFiRefugee

· 2025-12-07 10:50

Same old trick again. The timing is stuck at exactly 9 minutes—who would believe that's just a coincidence?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 2025-12-07 10:50

A typical pre-token-launch rug pull and cash out. How coordinated must they be to pull this off in just 9 minutes? What a move—dumping tokens on the exchange right before the official announcement, everything is clear as day on-chain. So the general retail investors are just here to be exit liquidity? Another great show—thank goodness we still have on-chain data as the truth officer.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 2025-12-07 10:48

Completed the entire process in 9 minutes—this pace is... a bit too much. --- Another mismatched timestamp? This time it's written directly on-chain, can't run from it. --- I just want to know what the project team is doing now—are they playing dead or did they really not notice? --- Withdrawal, token issuance, and official announcement all in one go—the only thing missing is directly writing "I'm here to scam you." --- Wait, BNB went straight to the exchange deposit address? Isn't that just blatant? --- The on-chain data is black and white—still trying to cover up this lie? Can't keep it together anymore, huh?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-1a2ed0b9

· 2025-12-07 10:43

This is the same old trick, insiders cashing out early. --- Full set of operations completed in 9 minutes? Truly an expert move. --- The on-chain data is right here, how are they going to explain this? --- The exchange deposit address ties it all up—this move is insane. --- Looks like we're about to get dumped on again, better stay away. --- Timestamps don't lie, the project team needs to come forward and explain. --- From withdrawal to token launch to official announcement, the precision is just too much.

View OriginalReply0