Dropping $44 billion on a social platform wasn't about profit margins. It was a bet on something bigger—keeping voices uncensored when everyone else is hitting the mute button.
Now? Racking up fines left and right just to hold that line. Most execs would fold after the first lawsuit. But some fights aren't measured in quarterly earnings.
This isn't corporate strategy. It's picking a hill to defend when the industry's walking the other way. The cost? Already paid. The alternative? A world where platforms decide what you're allowed to say.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HodlAndChill
· 2025-12-09 18:23
Spending 44.4 billion just so people can speak— I can't tell if this guy is truly crazy or truly clear-headed.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 2025-12-08 08:36
Really bold to dump... but is it really worth it now after being penalized like this?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 2025-12-07 22:18
Honestly, this move is something else. Burning money just to avoid deleting posts is truly outrageous, but also kind of cool.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 2025-12-07 08:54
Hi, trading real money for freedom of speech—whether this deal is worth it depends on how strong your convictions are.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugs
· 2025-12-07 08:54
This guy is for real, he doesn't care about money, he only cares about freedom of speech. He's a bit wild, but I respect him.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainArchaeologist
· 2025-12-07 08:52
ngl this is exactly what I’ve always wanted to see, an entrepreneur who really dares to speak up, regardless of making money or not
View OriginalReply0
ruggedNotShrugged
· 2025-12-07 08:50
Spending money is a small matter; freedom is priceless.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 2025-12-07 08:27
Spending 44 billion just to fight censorship—that kind of boldness is really something.
Dropping $44 billion on a social platform wasn't about profit margins. It was a bet on something bigger—keeping voices uncensored when everyone else is hitting the mute button.
Now? Racking up fines left and right just to hold that line. Most execs would fold after the first lawsuit. But some fights aren't measured in quarterly earnings.
This isn't corporate strategy. It's picking a hill to defend when the industry's walking the other way. The cost? Already paid. The alternative? A world where platforms decide what you're allowed to say.