2025-12-07 06:20:50

Recently, BlackRock executives have stated that asset tokenization could be the most significant technological transformation since the advent of the internet. They believe that blockchain will completely reshape the underlying infrastructure of finance.

In simple terms, this means turning traditionally hard-to-trade assets, such as real estate and bonds, into digital tokens on the blockchain. The benefits are obvious: liquidity is maximized, transaction costs are significantly reduced, and all operations are transparent and auditable.

The market's long-term outlook for this sector is quite optimistic. Some institutions predict that by 2030, the global market for tokenized assets could reach $10 trillion to $16 trillion.

More importantly, regulation is also accelerating. Europe's MiCA Act has already been implemented, and the US GENIUS Act is on its way. As these regulatory frameworks become clearer, they set the rules for industry development, which naturally boosts investor confidence.

The concept of RWA (Real World Assets) really seems to be moving from a narrative to actual implementation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NoStopLossNut

· 2025-12-10 06:00

BlackRock said that RWA is the biggest change since the Internet, which is too hard 10 trillion to 16 trillion? I believe you, wait until the policy is really implemented MiCA is out, which is indeed a bit interesting, but the United States is still scratching its head If RWA can really rise, real estate liquidity is revolutionary enough To be honest, BlackRock's current posture is paving the way for itself to make money Regulatory friendliness is a good thing, but the words of these large institutions have to be discounted By 2030, this number feels exaggerated, wait and see The real estate on the chain sounds good, but I'm afraid that the TradFi gang will do something wrong In fact, it is not so mysterious to put financial assets on the chain The real winners of this wave are probably those infrastructure sides

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 2025-12-10 02:05

BlackRock’s latest statements are probably going to get hyped up again, but as for this whole RWA thing... I actually think it has real potential. With all the regulation and policy changes, this time it feels different. $10 trillion to $16 trillion? Let’s wait and see—those numbers sound a bit wild to me. Tokenizing real estate bonds, unlocking full liquidity? Sounds great in theory, but I’m worried there might be some unexpected issues along the way. The US and Europe are really starting to take this seriously; shouldn’t we be catching up too? Is it really not just pure speculation this time? I’m a bit confused. Is RWA about to take off? That depends on how things actually get implemented. After MiCA went live, people only gradually started accepting it—America needs to join in too. Feels like the next big trend is coming. Should we get in early?

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 2025-12-09 22:36

Haters, get lost. BlackRock is absolutely right this time, RWA should have taken off long ago. --- Another trillion-level prediction. Believe it or not, I’m convinced. --- Regulations are finally out of the way. Now this is real positive news. --- Real estate on-chain? Just thinking about it is exciting—the day liquidity goes full throttle. --- With MiCA implemented and GENIUS on the way, the bigger picture is here, everyone. --- Tokenization really is a game-changer, just needs policy support to catch up. --- $16 trillion by 2030? That’s a conservative estimate—I think it’ll be even bigger. --- Finally, heavyweight institutions are taking sides. RWA is really coming this time. --- Trading costs slashed by more than half? Why are there still doubters? --- Don’t just talk about the narrative—let’s see who grabs the first mover advantage. --- Even BlackRock has spoken up. Isn’t that enough to prove the point?

View OriginalReply0

MintMaster

· 2025-12-08 16:01

BlackRock is here to fleece retail investors again, talking a big game. --- If RWA really takes off, the coins I’m holding will be worth something. --- $10 to $16 trillion? That’s just boasting, come on, wake up. --- If regulation really gets sorted out, then folks like us might have a shot. --- The key is to see real-world progress; talk alone isn’t enough. --- Tokenizing real estate sounds great, but I’m afraid it’ll just become another game for the big players. --- Europe’s moving, the US is bound to follow—this time is different. --- Let’s be real, institutions are just carving out the track for themselves. --- Maxed-out liquidity sounds nice, but who’s setting the prices? --- I don’t buy that 2030 number, but the trend is definitely right.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingToReadDocs

· 2025-12-07 06:50

BlackRock's statements this time are pretty good, but that $10-16 trillion figure... can it really be achieved? RWA has been hyped for a while now; the key is still how regulation will be implemented. Uh, why do I always feel like this round is just another marketing campaign? Can tokenized real estate transactions really reduce costs? Won't intermediaries go crazy? Is it reliable this time? Feels like it's always hyped up like this. Here we go again, more big talk. Let's revisit in 2030. Is MiCA actually being implemented? Has anyone tried it? The liquidity is definitely tempting, but what about the risks?

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 2025-12-07 06:47

BlackRock’s statements are definitely bold this time, but I’m a bit skeptical about that $10-16 trillion figure... Can it really be achieved? People have been hyping up RWA for a while now, but it still seems mostly like a buzzword. Regulation just makes things more complicated—MiCA’s rules are endless. Tokenizing real estate? Just thinking about it is complicated, how would property disputes even be handled? But to be fair, if everything really does go on-chain, the liquidity would be awesome... Let’s wait and see, 2030 is still a long way off.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 2025-12-07 06:44

These people at BlackRock sure dare to talk, but to be fair, it seems like they're not exaggerating this time... $10-16 trillion? I just want to know who can actually get a piece of that pie. Regulation is the real key—without it, RWA is just a castle in the sky. Is this just another chance to hype up a concept, or can it really transform the financial infrastructure? Wait, real estate transactions on-chain... so how are property taxes going to be calculated? Sounds nice, but in the end, it's all about who can scale up and implement it first. Now that MiCA has passed, isn't it time for us to get moving?

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologis

· 2025-12-07 06:26

From the perspective of financial artifacts, this wave of tokenization is somewhat like the evolution of ancient promissory notes—only this time, it’s permanently recorded on-chain.

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 2025-12-07 06:21

BlackRock's statement this time is a bit bold, but honestly, if RWAs really become a reality, the real estate sector could indeed unlock quite a lot.

View OriginalReply0