Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently put forward a rather interesting perspective—that Bitcoin is actually helping the world "transport" unused energy.

What does this mean? Think about it: in many remote mountainous areas or offshore wind farms, the electricity generated can't be delivered to urban power grids. It's either wasted outright or the power output has to be limited. But if mining equipment is set up locally, this otherwise wasted electricity can be converted into Bitcoin—a digital asset that can be transferred instantly and circulated globally.

This angle has definitely changed a lot of people's perceptions. Previously, everyone thought mining was just about burning electricity, but Huang pointed out another layer of logic: it's actually turning "energy trapped in one place" into "value that can be taken anywhere at any time." It's like bottling lightning, ready to use whenever you need it.

What's even more remarkable is that this model can actually optimize the power grid in reverse. When electricity demand peaks, mining farms can shut down at any time to free up power; during off-peak periods, they can ramp up to absorb excess capacity. To some extent, the Bitcoin network has become a massive "energy buffer pool."

Oil fields will run dry, transmission lines will age, but once energy is converted into Bitcoin, it becomes a string of code on your phone—it can cross oceans in just a few seconds. Is this a modern form of alchemy?

Interestingly, with an AI giant suddenly endorsing Bitcoin and energy, could there be a new trend of technological integration behind it? Energy democratization, power assetization... Do you think this path is viable?