Some of the short sellers, in order to talk down ASTER, are even bringing up physiognomy, which honestly made me laugh.

But no matter how much they talk, it doesn't change one fact—ASTER reaching $100 per token is not a dream. Unless BTC goes to zero, but is that really possible?

The underlying logic of the crypto world has always been decentralization. Right now, those leading exchanges, including BNB, are essentially centralized products. Why did the founder of one exchange create BNB, but then turn around to invest in ASTER and even become an advisor? The answer is simple: decentralization is the root of long-termism.

BNB was created to meet the market's current demand for convenience. But projects like ASTER are things that must be done for the future of the crypto industry. It's not just him—Justin Sun is working on DEXs, and Vitalik is also supporting decentralized exchanges. UNI, as the leading DEX spot platform, is the benchmark for the decentralized concept built on ETH.

And as for those who use physiognomy as an argument—by that logic, could Vitalik's face have created ETH, a project worth hundreds of billions of dollars? That's just typical prejudice.

Let the short sellers keep shorting; in the end, let's see who gets liquidated first. History tells us that bears who stand against the trend for too long usually don't end well.

ASTER and UNI—I believe both can break through $100. This isn't blind hype; it's a logical deduction based on the main theme of decentralization.