2025-12-06 22:25:26

Today might've stumbled onto something interesting in the Solana ecosystem - SAFEMARS.

What caught my attention? Their tokenomics model is pretty aggressive. They're channeling 100% of platform creator rewards straight into buyback and burn operations. Not 50%, not 80% - the full amount. And here's the kicker: you can actually watch it happen in real-time through their website dashboard terminal. Transparency level? Pretty high.

The deflationary mechanics are baked into the liquidity structure itself. Every transaction chips away at total supply. Whether this flywheel actually sustains momentum long-term remains to be seen, but the model's at least designed with scarcity in mind.

Anyone else tracking projects with automated burn mechanisms like this?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PensionDestroyer

· 2025-12-09 19:52

100% buyback and burn? Sounds pretty intense, but I’m worried it might just be a numbers game on paper.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterWang

· 2025-12-09 19:02

100% all buybacks and burns? I've seen this trick too many times. The key is still whether the team will rug pull later.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 2025-12-09 15:55

100% all buyback and burn? That number seems a bit too "perfect"... Need to check the real on-chain data, don’t be fooled by the dashboard. Usually, the higher the apparent transparency of such projects, the more likely there’s black-box operations behind the scenes.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 2025-12-06 22:55

NGL, 100% burn sounds good, but I’ve seen this trick on-chain too many times. How many can actually last until next year?

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 2025-12-06 22:47

100% direct burn sounds great, but the real question is whether it can be sustained in the long term.

View OriginalReply0

BankruptWorker

· 2025-12-06 22:46

Burning back 100% sounds great, but how long can this deflationary model last...

View OriginalReply0

ZeroRushCaptain

· 2025-12-06 22:44

100% buyback and burn? Sounds just like the story I heard last time I got rekt... But I should still keep an eye on it, maybe this time I'll make a comeback haha

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanLarry

· 2025-12-06 22:43

100% burn allocation sounds clean on paper but ngl the opportunity cost of zero reinvestment into protocol development is kinda wild. seen this flywheel narrative before—usually crashes when mev starts extracting more value than the burns create. thesis validation will be everything here

Reply0

WagmiWarrior

· 2025-12-06 22:39

100% buyback and burn? Sounds a bit too perfect. I feel like it could easily turn into a worthless project later on.

View OriginalReply0