2025-12-06 09:24:32

A leading DEX had an outrageous parameter configuration mistake, which directly drained 99% of the funds from the "Get Rich Soon" and "Instant Fortune" liquidity pools. The real kicker came afterward—they immediately dumped "Get Rich Soon," causing the token to crash, while tens of thousands of holders watched their account balances evaporate.

This move is practically a textbook on-chain negative case study. However, the community's reaction has been pretty resilient: "Thanks for this heavy blow—it exposed the true nature of centralized risk." Some are already rallying for the Year of the Horse in 2026, calling to revive meme culture and prove through real action that the spirit of decentralization is alive and well.

Honestly, DeFi code risks are always a Sword of Damocles hanging overhead. This incident is another reminder for everyone: don’t put all your eggs in one smart contract, no matter how awesome it looks.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Anon4461

· 2025-12-09 09:18

99% of the funds disappeared just like that, this is such a joke. --- Money comes in and goes out in no time, fate really loves to play tricks. --- So who should I trust now? Even the top players are this unreliable. --- Restart in 2026? Let's fill the current hole first. --- So this is the decentralization they bragged about? I'm laughing. --- One parameter ruined tens of thousands of people, the more I think about it, the scarier it gets. --- Looks like I really do need to diversify my coins, damn. --- Thanks for the textbook negative example, my wallet just taught me another lesson. --- Is it possible this wasn't a mistake at all? --- How can I avoid this kind of massacre next time?

View OriginalReply0

BitcoinDaddy

· 2025-12-09 00:20

Another "parameter mishap," to put it bluntly, it just means the internal operations collapsed. --- Damn, tens of thousands of accounts evaporated overnight? This is the platform you all trust? --- Comeback in the Year of the Horse 2026, let’s first make up for the losses this round before talking. --- The Sword of Damocles is hanging over us every day, I’ve been numb for a while now. --- “Thanks for the critical hit,” seriously, the awareness in this community is next level. --- A single parameter crashed the whole pool, how ridiculous is that? --- That’s how it is with centralized ones, is decentralized really that much better? --- Everyone understands the principle of not putting all your eggs in one basket, but no one actually listens. --- Wait, even the name “Soon To Be Rich” is painful enough. --- Code bugs are forever the deadliest killers, bar none.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 2025-12-07 12:47

99% of the funds are gone just like that. This move is definitely ruthless, but honestly, guys, it's time to learn the lesson. --- Damn, it's the same old "thanks for the critical hit" line again. Give me a break—if it were truly decentralized, how could a single parameter mistake cause such a collapse? --- The pool evaporated overnight. This is exactly why I never put all my assets into a single contract. --- Will we get back on our feet in the Year of the Horse 2026? Let's just try to survive until then. There are endless pitfalls on-chain. --- So we finally see the real face of centralized risk, and in the end, we still get rekt. It's a bit ironic, isn't it? --- That's why they say code is law, and bugs are law too. There's no such thing as absolute safety in DeFi. --- Tens of thousands of users watching their balances evaporate together—how hopeless must that be? If it were me, I'd be numb by now. --- Don't put all your eggs in one basket. How many times has that been said? Yet people still don't listen.

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost

· 2025-12-06 09:54

Ha, a parameter misconfiguration? This is a top project? LOL --- 99% is gone just like that, and they still call themselves a top project? --- Another on-chain tragedy, huh? Has no one learned to diversify risk? --- The community's "thanks for the critical hit" narrative is wild, really wild. --- Bounce back in the Year of the Horse 2026? Wake up, bro, this is just a casino. --- Code is just code, no sword of Damocles here—it's just that the wallet is empty. --- How can a parameter configuration be this absurd... I don't believe it was just a mistake. --- Tens of thousands of user accounts evaporated, and we’re still supposed to say thanks? Seriously? --- The more "powerful" a smart contract, the faster it dies—when will this pattern change? --- If you put all your chips in one pool, you asked for it.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 2025-12-06 09:53

99% evaporated instantly, this operation is honestly ridiculously absurd. LOL, making such a flashy move just because of a parameter error—really have to give DEX full marks for creativity. Man, anyone who still dares to go all in on a single pool now is a real warrior. Wait, the name "Get Rich Soon" is honestly pretty fitting right now. Yet another on-chain bloodbath—when will people finally learn their lesson? I have to hand it to the community for still getting hyped; I’ve been numb to this for a while. This is what they call "code doesn’t lie," but operations can. DeFi is always a casino, the only difference is the gambling table is on the blockchain. Honestly, I feel a bit sorry for those new retail investors—they haven’t learned anything yet and already got taught a hard lesson.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 2025-12-06 09:50

Getting rich in no time, losing it just as fast—this move is really something else. --- Is it another parameter configuration bug? There should have been risk control audits a long time ago. --- Just pulling out 99% should have been enough, but they even dumped the tokens—what kind of move is that? --- All the savvy ones are saying 2026 Year of the Horse is when we bounce back, but I just want to know who’s going to make up for my losses. --- Code risks are really impossible to guard against. Is it my fault for being too greedy? --- Seeing through centralized risks? It’s really just seeing through the character of certain people. --- I’m tired of hearing about the “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” theory. The problem is, no one truly believes it. --- Another batch of “how to fleece the newbies” tutorial videos is out. Honestly, this time they explained it pretty clearly. --- What’s the point of a tough community? The money in your account is what really matters, and now it’s all gone. --- DeFi is always going through cycles of “I’m never playing again,” and then everyone keeps playing.

View OriginalReply0

AlgoAlchemist

· 2025-12-06 09:42

99% taken away? Dude, what kind of outrageous config could cause this to happen? Bitcoin just taught us another lesson—"code is law" is no joke. Money comes fast, goes bankrupt just as fast. Hilarious—it's really "immediate." What are you waiting for until 2026? You need to diversify your risk now, man—don’t wait for the next disaster. This is why I never all in on a single pool—way too damn risky. These crash-and-burn stories happen every year, yet people never seem to learn. So much for decentralization—turns out parameter settings can still choke you. Damn, tens of thousands of user accounts wiped out—that’s gotta make a lot of people cry. Centralization risk? I'd say this is more like basic bug risk. Thanks to this incident, we got another free lesson on risk management.

View OriginalReply0