Many beginners ask me how to assess the "credibility" of a project. To be honest, don't just focus on Twitter and the KOLs' loud voices. I usually start by checking GitHub: Are there continuous commits? Are issues being responded to? Is the code not just dumped all at once right before launch? Then look at the audit reports—don't just look for the words "audited." The key is what issues were found, how serious problems were fixed, and whether there are clear re-audit records. Upgrading multi-signature wallets is also very important: Who are the signers? How many signatures are required? Can critical parameters be changed arbitrarily? The more "upgradable at any time," the more you should treat it as a management risk. Recently, everyone has been complaining about validator income, MEV, and fair ordering, and I understand. When rules change, retail investors usually suffer the most, so it's even more important to see clearly "who can change the rules." That's all for now. I’ll go review the multi-signature address and audit fix records of a certain staking protocol later.