Blockchain is hot, and DeFi is cool, none of which are wrong. But when faced with banks, fund companies, and institutions managing billions of assets, "cool" is simply not a consideration. What they want is only one word: stability.
Many public chains are selling ecological stories, promoting application numbers, and competing over user scale—these are indeed meaningful. But if I want to put a skyscraper, an enterprise bond, or even an investment fund directly on the blockchain for trading, what I need is definitely not just fast transaction speeds. I need reliability that allows me to sleep peacefully.
This is the real lesson that public chains need to learn.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashRatePhilosopher
· 6h ago
Stability is indeed a hard flaw; speed alone isn't enough.
---
What institutions truly care about is this; everything else is superficial.
---
Honestly, you still need a risk management system like a bank.
---
RWA on-chain sounds sexy, but if the underlying stability can't keep up, it's really a no-go.
---
That set of DeFi financial games, institutions don't even bother to look at it; it needs to be custodial, auditable, and reliable enough to sleep peacefully.
---
Public chains are still competing on speed and throughput, but they don't realize that what people really want isn't that.
---
Financial institutions' concerns are not unfounded; a single bug can mean billions lost. Would you dare to use it?
---
This is probably the real ceiling of blockchain; technology isn't the bottleneck, trust is.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 6h ago
Basically, everyone hyping DeFi right now is just self-indulgent; institutions simply aren't buying into it.
View OriginalReply0
NFTBlackHole
· 6h ago
Well said, that's the core. Institutions want that feeling of not having to wake up in the middle of the night.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 6h ago
That's right, institutions prioritize stability, not flashy tricks.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourer
· 6h ago
Institutions need stability, and there's nothing wrong with that, but right now, there aren't many public chains willing to confidently vouch for themselves.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 6h ago
That's right, no matter how high the TPS is, institutions only care about one word: stability.
Stability comes first; everything else is pointless.
Really, big funds don't care how loudly you boast; they only care whether you're willing to put billions of assets in.
Currently, on this point, all the chains are indeed still a bit immature.
Blockchain is hot, and DeFi is cool, none of which are wrong. But when faced with banks, fund companies, and institutions managing billions of assets, "cool" is simply not a consideration. What they want is only one word: stability.
Many public chains are selling ecological stories, promoting application numbers, and competing over user scale—these are indeed meaningful. But if I want to put a skyscraper, an enterprise bond, or even an investment fund directly on the blockchain for trading, what I need is definitely not just fast transaction speeds. I need reliability that allows me to sleep peacefully.
This is the real lesson that public chains need to learn.