2026-01-12 04:26:09

A compliant platform's lobbying efforts in the US Congress are intensifying. They are advocating to maintain the reward rights for users holding stablecoins, which is a significant move.

The key point is: if the upcoming bill includes restrictions on stablecoin rewards, this platform hints that it may change its support for the Digital Asset Market Structure Bill— in other words, negotiating terms. This move is quite interesting and reflects that stablecoin-related policies have become an important bargaining chip between the crypto industry and regulators. For investors, whether stablecoins can continue to generate yields directly affects user experience and exchange competitiveness.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LostBetweenChains

· 6h ago

This trick is just a disguised threat, refusing to let us earn stablecoin interest and then turning hostile? The stablecoin yield cut is basically a done deal; who will still use their platform then? Lobbying with this approach in the US is just throwing money around, but once it's written into legislation, it can't be changed. They really treat stablecoins as chips, but regulators just don't buy into this, haha. So, it's still necessary to deploy across multiple chains and not put all your eggs in one basket.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 6h ago

This is a typical case of "Don't touch my cheese and I'll cooperate with you," interesting. Once the stablecoin yields are cut, how many people will have to run? As for lobbying... basically, it's bargaining with politicians. It's still the era where money talks. This trick has been played out long ago; the premise is to gain subsequent support, a classic move in the industry. I just want to know how the final compromise will turn out; it seems neither side will suffer losses. Can the RMB USDT still be stable... I have no idea. The exchange's recent move is quite ruthless, directly using legislation as a bargaining chip. If yields disappear, users will leave; the exchange is betting aggressively on this. Once the reward permissions are tightened, retail investors will be the first to suffer.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiCaffeinator

· 6h ago

Stablecoin yields cut, and the exchange's competitiveness has directly collapsed. This lobbying effort is actually a desperate attempt to defend the market.

View OriginalReply0

TokenRationEater

· 6h ago

This is not compliance at all; it's clearly just discussing conditions. Once the stablecoin rewards are cut, they change their tune. I've seen this trick too many times.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 6h ago

Back at it again? Threatening to change your tone just to cut profits—typical big platform move --- Stablecoin yields get restricted and everyone freaks out—this is almost political extortion --- I told you, compliance is just a facade; when it really matters, they’ll still twist the truth --- Let’s wait and see—this lobbying effort definitely won’t pass; Congress won’t buy into it --- If yields disappear, trading volume will drop too—they’re pretty clever about this --- Is it worth all this fuss for a few basis points of return? Wake up, everyone --- Honestly, stablecoin yields shouldn’t even exist; this trap will be filled sooner or later --- The platform has laid all its cards on the table—what conditions are we even talking about?

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 6h ago

Tsk, playing the weight game again. I've seen this trick too many times. Basically, it's using stablecoin yields as chips to negotiate with regulators. Ordinary people might not understand, but we all know what's really going on. If they really impose restrictions, retail investors will have an even harder time. Yields are already thin enough.

View OriginalReply0