Ever noticed how naming mishaps can create massive pricing gaps in the pump token market? Check this out: while one project got pushed to 2M with the wrong name attached, the actual token still sitting quietly at 12K. That's a 160x gap driven purely by confusion. Multiple pump tokens are floating around, and traders are constantly mixing them up. The real underlying asset stays undervalued while the misidentified version pumps. It's a classic market inefficiency—when project names blur together, you get wild price divergences. Worth paying attention to before jumping into positions. Always verify the actual contract address and project credentials first.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 14h ago
Haha, 160x IQ tax, that's why I always have to copy and paste the contract address to verify it once again.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casino
· 14h ago
ngl, this kind of blunder is simply a nightmare for retail investors. A 160x price difference just because of a name mix-up? That's completely off the charts.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 14h ago
Haha, an 160x difference just because of a name mix-up? This crypto market is really something else.
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperer
· 14h ago
ngl this is just naming collision exploit territory waiting to happen. actually saw this pattern before—160x spread is less about inefficiency and more about lazy due diligence. technically speaking, if you can't verify a contract address in under 30 seconds, you've already lost to the scammers. most traders deserve to get rekt for this tbh
Reply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 14h ago
A 160x gap, in simple terms, is big players exploiting information asymmetry. We retail investors are always the last to take the fall.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 14h ago
NGL, someone always falls for this kind of rookie mistake. Who wouldn't be tempted by a 160x price difference?
Ever noticed how naming mishaps can create massive pricing gaps in the pump token market? Check this out: while one project got pushed to 2M with the wrong name attached, the actual token still sitting quietly at 12K. That's a 160x gap driven purely by confusion. Multiple pump tokens are floating around, and traders are constantly mixing them up. The real underlying asset stays undervalued while the misidentified version pumps. It's a classic market inefficiency—when project names blur together, you get wild price divergences. Worth paying attention to before jumping into positions. Always verify the actual contract address and project credentials first.