In the highly competitive decentralized storage sector, Walrus is not a follower but a true challenger holding core technology. Its killer feature is a 2D erasure coding algorithm called "Red Stuff"—which redefines how data is stored.



Traditional methods are painfully inefficient: copying files multiple times and dispersing them across nodes, with prohibitively high costs. Walrus took a different approach, slicing data into tiny "shards" and distributing them across the network using an optimized redundancy mechanism. With this change, efficiency skyrockets.

Numbers speak the loudest. Compared to schemes that require 25x redundancy to ensure data durability, Red Stuff only needs 4-5x redundancy to get the job done, and it can be made even more stable. Calculations show that storage costs can be reduced by over 80%. This not only saves money for users but also significantly improves overall network resource utilization.

The most impressive part is the recovery mechanism. Once data is encoded and dispersed, restoring it doesn't require retrieving all fragments—recovering a single shard is extremely low-cost. As a result, network resilience is outstanding—even if two-thirds of storage nodes go offline simultaneously, the original data can still be fully reconstructed. For projects requiring high availability and censorship-resistant storage, this is a real guarantee.

Walrus’s overall architecture is also thoughtfully designed. Data exists within a decentralized node network, with only hashes and storage proofs recorded on-chain (Sui) for key verification. This ensures data immutability and verifiability while avoiding astronomical costs associated with storing massive amounts of data directly on the blockchain. Security and efficiency are both achieved without compromise.

Walrus demonstrates through practical technological innovation that decentralized storage can be not only safer and more censorship-resistant but also cheaper. This is the true evolution that the storage sector needs.
SUI3,73%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WenMoon42vip
· 01-12 01:49
Red material algorithm is truly awesome, 4-5 times redundancy beats 25 times, this is what I call technological innovation. Walrus's architecture design, data off-chain, proof on-chain, is simply a textbook-level elegant solution. Wait, how is this 80% cost reduction calculated? Are there any real-world test data? I want to learn more about the recovery mechanism; being able to withstand the loss of 2/3 nodes sounds a bit harsh. It's another project from the Sui ecosystem, now everyone is leaning that way. But honestly, compared to the IPFS system, Walrus does have some real substance. With such low costs, will it affect node rewards? I need to think more about this investment logic.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiChallengervip
· 01-12 01:41
Cut costs by 80%? The irony is, last time it was IPFS promoting cost reduction and efficiency. And now? [Cold Laugh] I'm not trying to argue, but the real test lies in the incentive mechanism. No matter how brilliant this algorithm is, why would nodes continue to participate? Technological innovation is indeed there, but with the Sui ecosystem's size, don't expect a storage layer to turn the tide. From a data perspective, comparing 4-5 times redundancy to 25 times is a bit misleading. Who exactly is the benchmark? Interesting, another genius who thinks they've solved the three major dilemmas of distributed storage [Funny] Alright, assuming the technology is fine, what about commercial implementation? Where are the ecosystem applications? The biggest risk for projects like this has never been technology but whether the market truly needs it. It sounds like shifting the redundancy problem from the network layer to the coding layer, but essentially nothing has changed. We’ll have to wait half a year to see who analyzes better. It’s too early to draw conclusions now.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMastervip
· 01-12 01:38
Wait, can Red Stuff really hold up? Or is it just another marketing gimmick? --- 80% cost reduction... I need to see what others are saying about this data. --- Finally, someone is seriously working on storage. The previous bunch of projects really dragged down the industry. --- Sui ecosystem has some big news again. Is this one reliable? --- Fourfold redundancy is enough? Still feel like I need to verify actual performance. --- That's real innovation, not just tweaking parameters and bragging about it. --- Resistant to censorship + cheap. If they can really do it, I’ll believe it. --- Two-thirds of nodes going offline and still recovering—that would be amazing if it really works. --- Both Sui and decentralized storage—this track is getting too competitive now.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 01-12 01:29
Damn, an 80% cost reduction? Is Red Stuff really that powerful? Feels a bit exaggerated. Walrus's approach is indeed innovative, but there are many pitfalls in decentralized storage. It depends on whether it can truly be implemented. 4-5 times redundancy vs 25 times? If it can really stay stable, that would be amazing. But the premise is reliable nodes. Sui ecosystem is introducing new things again, this time it doesn't seem like a typical pump-and-dump scheme. Two-thirds of nodes going offline and still recovering—that resilience is truly impressive. Everyone says costs are cut by 80%, so why aren't more people using it now? Is there a barrier, or has the market not caught on yet? Another storage solution that could change the world. Believe it or not, let's wait and see before jumping on board.
View OriginalReply0
HodlVeteranvip
· 01-12 01:25
Cut 80% of the costs? How can I not believe this number... Last time I heard IPFS hyped up like this, I was all in.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)