There is an angle I want to discuss with everyone: data storage is everywhere, but the core question is—what kind of data truly deserves to be protected by blockchain?
Just to give an example. Losing movies stored in cloud drives isn't a big deal, but the birth videos of your children, or the code for your thesis that took half a year to refine? Once lost, it's gone forever. It's like you can never go back to that moment.
The idea behind the Walrus protocol is very interesting. Unlike traditional methods that copy files countless times—an approach that becomes prohibitively expensive—it uses erasure coding to split files into fragments and disperse them across the network. As long as most of the fragments can be retrieved, the original data can be fully reconstructed. This reduces costs to about 20% of traditional methods. What does being cheaper mean? It means that truly important things can be stored securely for a lifetime.
For example, imagine拆成零件,分给十个小朋友各保管一些。不需要十个都在,六七个就能拼回完整的城堡。或者想象秘密地图被撕成九份,藏在不同地方——找到五份就能推断出宝藏位置。数据存储的逻辑完全一样。既能保证安全,成本也漂亮。
Numbers don't lie. To date, over 5PB of data has been stored on the network, with more than 1 billion $WAL tokens locked inside. This shows that there are real users relying on it, not just hype.
Digging deeper, storage inevitably involves privacy. Walrus integrates the Seal privacy layer, ensuring data is encrypted from the moment of upload. AI wants to use your data to train models? Sure, but it can do so while the data remains encrypted.
Initially, I also thought this might be a hollow promise. Until I saw it deeply integrated with projects like Pudgy Penguins, handling the migration of millions of credentials, I realized this is solving real problems.
So, Walrus is not just a storage tool. It uses the power of mathematics and distributed networks to help you safeguard those digital memories that, once lost, can never be recovered. In a time full of hype, something rooted in improving data certainty actually seems a bit precious.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonWaterDroplets
· 3h ago
I have to say, finally someone addressed the pain points
The example of the baby birth video really hit me; it’s truly irreversible
I believe that erasing encoding costs can be reduced to 20%, but the key is whether anyone actually uses it... I only half believe it after seeing 1 billion WAL tokens locked
Pudgy Penguins' integration sounds quite practical
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 3h ago
Wow, someone finally hit the nail on the head— not all data needs to be on-chain.
5PB of data + 1 billion WAL locked, this number really has some substance.
Why didn't I think of that erasure coding logic... saving costs while remaining secure?
But I need to see how effective the privacy layer actually is.
The integration with Pudgy Penguins sounds promising; there aren't many projects that truly solve problems.
The birth video example really struck me—some things are truly one of a kind.
Cutting costs by 20%? The pricing model needs to be examined carefully.
This really doesn't seem like bragging; it has the flavor of practical application.
I like the mathematical approach to distributed storage; it's much more reliable than traditional replication.
Training models in encrypted state with AI? A new perspective, and it actually protects privacy.
Digital data really doesn't lie; the 5PB scale indicates genuine demand.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 3h ago
Damn, the video of the child's birth is permanently lost, and the thought of it being gone is suffocating. This encryption method is really impressive.
Has WAL truly broken out of the circle? Ten billion tokens locked with five PB of data... This is not just talk.
Seal's privacy layer has some real substance. AI wants to freeload your data? Feel free under encryption, haha.
Pudgy Penguins are all using it... alright, I need to reevaluate this path.
Rooted in data certainty, things that are truly scarce in the era of crazy hype, I buy this perspective.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 3h ago
This erasure coding idea is indeed brilliant, but I'm still a bit worried about node stability.
Forget it, seeing them actually using it shows it's not just talk.
Compared to those projects that boast every day, having data and applications at least means they're not completely nonsense.
Wait, is this privacy layer really that reliable? Or is it just another gimmick?
5PB of data and 1 billion $WAL tokens on the chain are indeed solid things, I admit that.
I just want to see how many can survive after another dip; those are the projects truly worth testing.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 3h ago
The video of the child's birth really touched me, honestly, these things can't be discarded
---
20% cost? Alright, numbers speak for themselves, I believe
---
Erasing the logic of encoding is actually pretty impressive, but the key is that someone is actually using it
---
Adding a privacy layer, this detail is good, at least someone thought of it
---
The migration of Pudgy Penguins is confirmed, no more pretending
---
After all this hype, finally seeing something actually implemented
---
Compared to those empty projects, Walrus is at least solving real problems
---
What does 5PB of data mean? Someone is actually relying on it, not just hype
---
Can never go back to that moment... this sentence is harsh, hits right in the heart
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 3h ago
The erasure coding approach is really awesome, cutting costs directly to 20%. This is truly genuine innovation.
To be honest, I was a bit skeptical at first, but after seeing the application on Pudgy Penguins, I understand—this is not just hype.
The Lego castle analogy is perfect, haha. It instantly clarifies what redundant design means.
The key is in privacy—under encryption, AI can't even think about messing around, and I didn't expect it could be played like this.
5PB+1 billion WAL, the numbers are right here. It must be used by real people to accumulate like this.
The birth video example really hit home. This is the kind of thing blockchain should truly be doing.
Suddenly I understand what guarding digital memories means. Compared to hype, this kind of practical stuff is indeed more valuable.
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 4h ago
The idea of erasing encoding is indeed brilliant. Reducing the cost to one-fifth while still ensuring security is impressive. But how many people actually use it?
The line about the child's birth video really hit home, but the problem is that most people probably wouldn't think of storing such things on-chain.
Locking 5PB and 1 billion WAL sounds quite impressive, but it's unclear how much of this is genuine demand versus speculative capital.
The Pudgy Penguins case is more reliable, but in the NFT community, everyone keeps saying everything is depreciating. Still, let's wait and see more project cases.
I'm quite impressed with encrypted storage privacy. At least it's much more transparent than centralized cloud storage solutions.
There is an angle I want to discuss with everyone: data storage is everywhere, but the core question is—what kind of data truly deserves to be protected by blockchain?
Just to give an example. Losing movies stored in cloud drives isn't a big deal, but the birth videos of your children, or the code for your thesis that took half a year to refine? Once lost, it's gone forever. It's like you can never go back to that moment.
The idea behind the Walrus protocol is very interesting. Unlike traditional methods that copy files countless times—an approach that becomes prohibitively expensive—it uses erasure coding to split files into fragments and disperse them across the network. As long as most of the fragments can be retrieved, the original data can be fully reconstructed. This reduces costs to about 20% of traditional methods. What does being cheaper mean? It means that truly important things can be stored securely for a lifetime.
For example, imagine拆成零件,分给十个小朋友各保管一些。不需要十个都在,六七个就能拼回完整的城堡。或者想象秘密地图被撕成九份,藏在不同地方——找到五份就能推断出宝藏位置。数据存储的逻辑完全一样。既能保证安全,成本也漂亮。
Numbers don't lie. To date, over 5PB of data has been stored on the network, with more than 1 billion $WAL tokens locked inside. This shows that there are real users relying on it, not just hype.
Digging deeper, storage inevitably involves privacy. Walrus integrates the Seal privacy layer, ensuring data is encrypted from the moment of upload. AI wants to use your data to train models? Sure, but it can do so while the data remains encrypted.
Initially, I also thought this might be a hollow promise. Until I saw it deeply integrated with projects like Pudgy Penguins, handling the migration of millions of credentials, I realized this is solving real problems.
So, Walrus is not just a storage tool. It uses the power of mathematics and distributed networks to help you safeguard those digital memories that, once lost, can never be recovered. In a time full of hype, something rooted in improving data certainty actually seems a bit precious.