When there are only 20 posts per user every 24 hours, it actually makes things harder to find the good stuff. The signal-to-noise ratio becomes brutal. You're scrolling through everything trying to spot quality content in such a limited feed.
It's refreshing to see a platform actually push back against content spam instead of letting low-quality posts flood the timeline. Most social networks just let things spiral into chaos chasing engagement metrics.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropAnxiety
· 6h ago
20 restrictions? That's funny. Isn't this just forcing us to curate content?
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 7h ago
Oh no, the 20-item limit actually makes it harder for me to find things. That logic is a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 7h ago
20 restrictions? Isn't this just a disguised way to encourage everyone to engage in detailed operations? Instead, it pushes out only valuable content.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 7h ago
Hmm, is it really that hard to find good content with 20 restrictions? I actually think fewer spam posts make it more refreshing.
When there are only 20 posts per user every 24 hours, it actually makes things harder to find the good stuff. The signal-to-noise ratio becomes brutal. You're scrolling through everything trying to spot quality content in such a limited feed.
It's refreshing to see a platform actually push back against content spam instead of letting low-quality posts flood the timeline. Most social networks just let things spiral into chaos chasing engagement metrics.