There are quite a few people optimistic about $DUSK, but not many truly understand its investment logic. Frankly speaking, the reason why DUSK has potential is that it satisfies two key conditions simultaneously.
First, the most direct one — demand side. After the full promotion of the STOX platform, $DUSK will become the sole token used to pay for gas fees. This is not an empty promise but a real use case. As the platform's trading volume grows, the demand for gas fees will naturally increase. But that's not the most clever part; the clever part is that a portion of each gas fee is directly burned. Think about it — demand is increasing, circulation is decreasing, and this "double-edged" situation is most likely to trigger a price explosion in the crypto market.
Secondly, the appeal of returns. The annualized staking yield for $DUSK can reach 20%-30%, which is among the top tiers in the entire market. For long-term investors, staking after entering at a low point allows them to steadily hold their chips and wait for a rise, while also earning staking rewards for free — two benefits from one investment. The key is that such high locking yields will encourage more people to stake rather than sell, further compressing market circulation and creating a virtuous cycle of "locking — reduced supply — price increase."
Finally, ecosystem support. Dusk Network has increased its Grants Program budget this year, continuously allocating resources to developers and projects. A project that only has tokens but lacks ecosystem applications will ultimately be ineffective. But Dusk Network clearly aims for a long-term path — through continuous funding and incentives, it attracts high-quality developers and DA participants, injecting lasting vitality into the entire network.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
EternalMiner
· 4h ago
Staking 20-30% annualized return, I need to double-check this number before I can believe it.
---
Gas fee burning + lock-up to pressure the supply, sounds like it's paving the way for the token price.
---
No matter how good it sounds, we still need to see how STOX performs in actual use.
---
Ecological investment has indeed been put in, but how many projects will ultimately die after Grants is hard to say.
---
Low-level staking, essentially free income, the logic isn't a problem.
---
Reduced supply and increased demand, this formula works well in a bull market, but in a bear market, it's a different story.
---
I just want to know how long the 20-30% staking yield can last; isn't this an excess return?
---
I'm skeptical about whether Dusk has real application scenarios; just having a burn mechanism isn't enough.
---
I've heard this "two-front attack" explanation too many times, and it usually doesn't amount to much.
---
Staking liquidity is so poor, when you really need to use it, just unlocking can mean waiting to die.
View OriginalReply0
MevWhisperer
· 4h ago
That's a valid point. The combination of a destruction mechanism and high staking yields is indeed powerful. However, whether it truly takes off depends on whether the ecosystem development can keep up, so it doesn't end up as just a worthless token.
View OriginalReply0
StopLossMaster
· 4h ago
Breaking the coin, the destruction mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried it might be just another air project.
---
Staking over 20 points? How much money would it take to get out? Might as well go gambling...
---
Ecosystem support? I just want to ask if anyone is actually using STOX, don’t just talk about concepts.
---
Gas fee destruction does require some thought, but it depends on whether trading volume can keep up.
---
I'm just worried that too many people are locking in their positions, and when they really want to sell, they won't be able to.
---
Another project that relies on staking to siphon funds, let's wait and see.
---
They speak nicely, but the key is whether the market will buy it or not.
---
This logic seems applicable in any bull market...
---
Ah, low-position deployment sounds simple, but why can't I seem to bottom out?
---
Whether ecosystem developers come or not is crucial; without applications, it's just stacking.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 4h ago
hold up, let me pull the data on this $DUSK narrative... 20-30% staking yields sound textbook, but wallets clustering shows typical pump mechanics written all over it
那burn机制听起来太完美了,ngl有点suspicious... remember folks always DYOR
这种锁仓压缩流动性的套路... pattern analysis suggests过去见过太多次了
gas fee monopoly claim需要验证,flagged transactions都查清楚了没?
生态投资听起来不错但资金真的到位了?还是又一个空头承诺
Reply0
LiquidityHunter
· 4h ago
Hey, really? I didn't expect the gas fee burn to be a thing, that’s indeed a clever move.
Staking 20-30% annual yield? Sounds a bit suspicious; I need to see historical backtest data to believe it.
The tactic of burning funds to support developers is something I've seen many times, but the key is having someone actually build on it.
This logic sounds quite complete at first glance, but be careful with the supply compression part; it could become another scheme to cut the leeks.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 5h ago
Damn, the destruction mechanism with 20% staking rewards—this logic really has some substance.
Reducing circulation supply combined with increased demand, it really seems like only a price increase is possible.
The real test is in the ecosystem—whether anyone will actually build it.
With such high staking rewards, I'm just worried it might be another empty promise.
But I respect the logic of positioning for staking at low levels, steadily earning yields while waiting for the next wave.
The combination of destruction + staking lock-up is a killer move; this tactic is truly unbeatable in a bull market.
There are quite a few people optimistic about $DUSK, but not many truly understand its investment logic. Frankly speaking, the reason why DUSK has potential is that it satisfies two key conditions simultaneously.
First, the most direct one — demand side. After the full promotion of the STOX platform, $DUSK will become the sole token used to pay for gas fees. This is not an empty promise but a real use case. As the platform's trading volume grows, the demand for gas fees will naturally increase. But that's not the most clever part; the clever part is that a portion of each gas fee is directly burned. Think about it — demand is increasing, circulation is decreasing, and this "double-edged" situation is most likely to trigger a price explosion in the crypto market.
Secondly, the appeal of returns. The annualized staking yield for $DUSK can reach 20%-30%, which is among the top tiers in the entire market. For long-term investors, staking after entering at a low point allows them to steadily hold their chips and wait for a rise, while also earning staking rewards for free — two benefits from one investment. The key is that such high locking yields will encourage more people to stake rather than sell, further compressing market circulation and creating a virtuous cycle of "locking — reduced supply — price increase."
Finally, ecosystem support. Dusk Network has increased its Grants Program budget this year, continuously allocating resources to developers and projects. A project that only has tokens but lacks ecosystem applications will ultimately be ineffective. But Dusk Network clearly aims for a long-term path — through continuous funding and incentives, it attracts high-quality developers and DA participants, injecting lasting vitality into the entire network.