Recently studying the architectural design of the Walrus protocol, I discovered a very critical issue—how does the system hold up when large-scale node failures or network partitions occur?



This brings us back to disaster recovery and network resilience. The protocol layer must have predefined response plans and cannot rely on last-minute solutions. More importantly, resilience testing should be conducted regularly to simulate various extreme scenarios and see if data can truly be recovered.

There are two core metrics that are especially important in measuring system resilience—Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Data Recovery Point Objective (RPO). These two indicators need to be clearly designed, and the test results should be made open and transparent. Only then can we truly verify whether a protocol can stand the test.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WagmiOrRektvip
· 13h ago
To be honest, most project teams are vague about the RTO and RPO metrics, and there are very few who actually dare to publicly publish test results.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 13h ago
This guy really dares to ask, if the node crashes, can the system still survive? Looks like Walrus needs to protect its vital parts well enough.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 13h ago
Are the RTO and RPO figures publicly available? Without data, it's all talk. Right now, many protocols are boasting about resilience, but few actually dare to test it.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 13h ago
Wow, the metrics RTO and RPO are really being overlooked too much. Most projects don't even dare to publicly test the results...
View OriginalReply0
StableNomadvip
· 13h ago
nah actually... RTO/RPO metrics are just security theater if nobody's stress-testing them regularly. reminds me of UST in may — everyone *claimed* the mechanism was bulletproof until it wasn't. walrus better have war stories to back this up, not just theoretical stability claims
Reply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 14h ago
To be honest, RTO and RPO are mostly just on-paper figures for most projects, and very few have actually undergone extreme stress testing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)