There are so many DEX projects nowadays that it's overwhelming. To be blunt, most of them make me want to exit as soon as I join. The interfaces are monotonous, the operational logic isn't much different, and they just change the skin and rename it as a new product. Once the trade is over, there's no story, users have little sense of participation, and there's no reason to stay.
But there are exceptions. Some teams never intended to follow the "mainstream" approach from the start, focusing on Perp DEX, and instead have created something with a bit of flavor. These products don't follow the trend of piling on identical features; instead, they put effort into details like interaction, incentive mechanisms, or community management. Users can feel the difference, have reasons to stay, and reasons to interact repeatedly—this is the logic of survival.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xSherlock
· 18h ago
Most DEXs are just re-skins, not interesting.
Perp has indeed seen some creative approaches; the details reveal the true skill.
Good interaction design can really retain users, I admit that.
The phenomenon of DEXs clustering is basically a trend of copying.
Projects with thoughtful incentive mechanisms are indeed different.
I prefer teams that focus on a specific track and go all-in.
Big companies copying templates should have been eliminated long ago.
The sense of participation is often overlooked, but it's actually the most crucial.
I'm optimistic about the differentiated approach of Perp DEXs and will continue to observe.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-bd883c58
· 18h ago
Most DEXs are just rebranded versions, not very interesting.
Perp DEXs are the only ones with some potential; the true details are revealed in the specifics.
Everyone is tired of the same old interactions; it needs some soul to stand out.
This round shows who is genuinely dedicated and who is just going through the motions.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropGrandpa
· 18h ago
Changing skins and names just to go online—really impressive
These Perp DEXes are the ones with real ideas; details determine life or death
Most DEXes are just a pile of garbage code with terrible user experience
Perp is the right path; good incentives mean profit
Same old products should have died long ago
Only DEXes with community warmth are worth playing
DEXes that change skins every day should really get out
Differentiation is the key to survival; everything else is just decoration
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 18h ago
Changing skins and renaming as new products, I'm tired of this routine haha
Unremarkable DEXs should have died long ago, Perp is the real game-changer
Details determine life or death; good interaction and strong incentives are essential to survive
Really, most DEXs are just shells, lacking soul
Agreed, whoever can do community management well will win
Copying the same thing every day, no wonder no one stays
Perp DEX truly has the greatest differentiation, others are really not worth mentioning
Changing the UI and calling it innovation, it's hilarious
A sense of participation is the core competitive advantage
A bunch of copies, just waiting for someone to truly innovate and break the situation
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 18h ago
Changing skins and renaming just to go public, this cracks me up.
Honestly, Perp DEX is indeed a bit different.
I just want to know how those products that truly survive do it?
Actually, in the end, it's still a community thing.
This is the kind of thing I want to see.
With such a high failure rate of DEXs, someone should have already compiled a blacklist.
There is a possibility that the market hasn't found a killer app yet?
Details reveal the truth; most projects really don't have the energy to focus on this.
It seems that only Perp DEX still has some vitality, while others are just the same old story.
There are so many DEX projects nowadays that it's overwhelming. To be blunt, most of them make me want to exit as soon as I join. The interfaces are monotonous, the operational logic isn't much different, and they just change the skin and rename it as a new product. Once the trade is over, there's no story, users have little sense of participation, and there's no reason to stay.
But there are exceptions. Some teams never intended to follow the "mainstream" approach from the start, focusing on Perp DEX, and instead have created something with a bit of flavor. These products don't follow the trend of piling on identical features; instead, they put effort into details like interaction, incentive mechanisms, or community management. Users can feel the difference, have reasons to stay, and reasons to interact repeatedly—this is the logic of survival.