The hype around Monad has faded. Looking back to the early days, developers flocked in, funding was massive, and it was positioned as the next-generation L1 public chain. Now, its market cap has dropped to about $265 million, the hype has dissipated, and community activity has significantly declined.
This has been followed by a new wave of capital and attention—how many participants have shifted to emerging gaming tokens like Burger? These projects promise a casino-like trading experience, attracting investors seeking new opportunities.
It is worth noting that although the P2E gaming sector has experienced multiple sharp corrections, projects like Burger may explore more sustainable player ownership models—this could be a key direction for the iteration of the GameFi ecosystem.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorSweeper
· 19h ago
monad bags getting liquidated while burger pumps... classic rotation into the new shiny. honestly? the "sustainable ownership model" pitch is just cope for when these casino tokens inevitably crater too lmao
Reply0
FUDwatcher
· 19h ago
It's the same cycle of cutting leeks again. When Monad cools down, everyone rushes to Burger. This routine has been played out already.
From the L1 myth to its downfall, it turns out there are no eternal favorites.
How far can Burger go... Honestly, I don't think it's promising. Who doesn't know about the P2E mess?
Let's wait for the next hot topic to take over, as money always needs to flow somewhere.
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 19h ago
It's another cycle of cutting leeks. Monad is cooling off, and everyone is rushing to Burger... This script is truly unchanging.
To be honest, I don't believe Burger's casino experience; GameFi just keeps dying over and over again.
However, the fact that holders can share in the profits is somewhat interesting—much better than just air.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者
· 20h ago
Another bubble burst, funds always follow hype and ignore the people
Monad indeed cooled down this time, but don’t rush to go all in on Burger, history tends to repeat itself
From big investors to obscurity, this routine is exactly the same, just a different coat of paint
All that talk about P2E and its issues, no matter how much you debate "sustainability," it won't save it; it all depends on how long it can survive
This time it’s GameFi, what’s the next new concept? Capital loves to cut the new leek
Casino-like trading experience? Just hearing that, you know the risk is off the charts. Count me in—I’m used to losing money anyway
Still debating whether to invest in Monad or Burger, have you really learned lessons from the last crash?
The market cap drops so much, yet some still rush in. I just don’t understand the logic behind this market
Ownership models sound sophisticated, but in the end, it all comes down to whether there are real application scenarios
Leeks take turns; today you’re a victim of Monad, tomorrow you might be cannon fodder for Burger
The hype around Monad has faded. Looking back to the early days, developers flocked in, funding was massive, and it was positioned as the next-generation L1 public chain. Now, its market cap has dropped to about $265 million, the hype has dissipated, and community activity has significantly declined.
This has been followed by a new wave of capital and attention—how many participants have shifted to emerging gaming tokens like Burger? These projects promise a casino-like trading experience, attracting investors seeking new opportunities.
It is worth noting that although the P2E gaming sector has experienced multiple sharp corrections, projects like Burger may explore more sustainable player ownership models—this could be a key direction for the iteration of the GameFi ecosystem.