Why can't crypto communities reach consensus on token selection? The real bottleneck often comes down to conflicting incentives. When high-profile accounts with limited actual expertise still hold outsized influence in decision-making, it creates friction. Those with genuine skills get drowned out by noise from influential players chasing quick gains. The result? Communities fragment over disagreements that could've been resolved through merit-based dialogue instead of power plays. Until we separate reputation from actual contribution, tokenomics debates will keep hitting the same wall.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropFatigue
· 16h ago
It's the same old story, how many times do I have to tell you, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 01-11 03:49
Isn't this just the old problem in the crypto world—big influencers' trash talk overshadowing technical expertise?
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 01-11 03:47
Basically, it's just the big influencers in the crypto circle scamming people, while those who truly understand the technology have no say.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 01-11 03:36
Basically, it's just the big influencers playing power games, while the true experts get drowned out.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterBearish
· 01-11 03:28
It's the same old story... Influencers can determine life or death through their sales, while those who truly understand the technology become invisible. This circle should have been reshuffled long ago.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTs
· 01-11 03:25
Basically, it's that big V influencers have too much say, while those who are truly capable are ignored.
Why can't crypto communities reach consensus on token selection? The real bottleneck often comes down to conflicting incentives. When high-profile accounts with limited actual expertise still hold outsized influence in decision-making, it creates friction. Those with genuine skills get drowned out by noise from influential players chasing quick gains. The result? Communities fragment over disagreements that could've been resolved through merit-based dialogue instead of power plays. Until we separate reputation from actual contribution, tokenomics debates will keep hitting the same wall.