2026-01-11 03:22:19

The crypto world has another new trick. A project has introduced a "Flexible Bottom Support" mechanism, which is changing the traditional project operation logic.

The problem is obvious—most projects face the same dilemma: project teams dump tokens, large holders harvest profits, retail investors get caught. 99% of projects still use the old approach—crazy marketing to attract traffic, and then what? Accumulating chips, falling prices, ecosystem collapse.

How does this new mechanism work? The bottom support pool is set at 200U per trillion tokens, while the actual market price is at 100U per trillion tokens. This creates an arbitrage opportunity. Large token holders see the price difference and actively redeem chips from the bottom support pool to earn the spread. What’s the key? Chips are directly burned, preventing a dump. After receiving U tokens, some large holders will buy back chips, promoting market circulation.

As a result, four effects occur simultaneously: rapid chip burning, easing market pressure, eliminating whale manipulation, and automatically generating upward momentum. This forms a self-reinforcing positive cycle.

A good mechanism design is not a tool to cut retail investors’ gains, but the foundation for continuous ecosystem value appreciation. This approach is indeed worth market attention.

Will this direction become a reference for future DeFi projects? We’ll have to keep observing.

DEFI2,1%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenVelocity

· 17h ago

Sounds like more empty promises? How long can this arbitrage strategy last?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 17h ago

Sounds great, but why do I feel like I've seen this logic before?

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoChain

· 17h ago

Wait, can this bottom support mechanism really operate automatically? It still seems to depend on execution. --- Basically, it's just old wine in new bottles. We'll know the truth in three months. --- Wow, someone finally thought of using economic design to solve the problem. Not bad. --- The difference between 200 and 100, after big players arbitrage madly, it's probably gone, right? --- No matter how perfect the mechanism is, it still depends on whether the project team will mess around. --- This logic sounds good at first, but destroying tokens also needs genuine demand to support it. --- I just want to know how many people will become test subjects this time. --- It's like adding a "tech shell" on top of a leek-cutting scheme. Interesting. --- If it can truly form a positive cycle, the crypto market would have no bear market long ago. --- Anyway, I don't believe it. Let's see how that project dies first.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 17h ago

This logic sounds good, but I still have some doubts... Will the big players really obediently throw their chips in? Or is this another carefully planned setup before a harvest?

View OriginalReply0

WalletManager

· 17h ago

Sounds good, but I need to see on-chain data to believe it. This bottom-line mechanism is essentially an incentive structure design; the key is to see how the smart contract audit turns out—whether there are reentrancy vulnerabilities, permission issues, and other old pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

zkNoob

· 17h ago

To be honest, this bottom-line support mechanism sounds quite innovative, but I still have some doubts... How many projects can truly execute it effectively?

View OriginalReply0