Having been involved in the Web3 space for so many years, my biggest lesson comes from the storage sector. Honestly, I’ve had quite a few setbacks in this area—I've interacted with seven or eight storage projects, and the outcomes are usually twofold: either the team runs away, or the tokens are wiped out completely. Some of those valuable data have been permanently lost, others stored in the system can never be retrieved again. Every time I encounter a new decentralized storage project, I instinctively resist, thinking these are just old wine in new bottles, deceptive tricks.
It wasn’t until I came across the concept of programmable storage that my perspective gradually changed. After some in-depth research, I realized a harsh truth: the storage sector itself isn’t a fake demand; the problem lies in the fact that those previous project teams simply didn’t find the right direction. What they built had fundamental flaws in their technical philosophy. The programmable storage model, on the other hand, is what the Web3 storage ecosystem should look like. The WAL token isn’t just a speculative tool; it represents the core value of the entire ecosystem. Now, I have shifted all my positions in the storage sector toward this direction. This isn’t a fleeting impulse, but a firm choice made after thinking through the logic clearly.
Speaking of which, my previous understanding of decentralized storage was indeed superficial. At that time, I only thought: splitting data into fragments and dispersing them across different nodes means users don’t have to rely on a single company, so it’s safe. I never considered whether the product was user-friendly or whether it could connect with real-world applications. Looking back now, it was precisely this one-sided understanding that cost me dearly.
The most memorable mistake I made was two years ago. There was a storage project that was extremely popular at the time, with very enticing promotional copy—unlimited expansion, permanent storage, staking tokens with an annualized yield of over 20%. I was blinded by the promise of high returns, not only heavily bought into the tokens but also stored all my years of work materials and creative content there. Needless to say, the project eventually flopped, and those data disappeared along with it. That moment made me realize that the many failures in this sector weren’t due to storage demand itself being flawed, but because the execution completely deviated from actual application scenarios.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
zkProofGremlin
· 44m ago
It's the old familiar story of "I finally had an epiphany"... but this time, the cost of falling into the trap was truly severe.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 18h ago
Having stumbled so many times, I still feel a bit hesitant about programmable storage now, worried about repeating the same story again.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 18h ago
ngl, the storage graveyard hits different when you're the one who lost data. but here's the thing—mile 20 in this marathon is where weak hands tap out and real conviction gets tested. programmable storage isn't just another pivot; it's actually solving execution, not just philosophy.
Reply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 18h ago
Damn, it's another story about storage, bro. I've been scammed too, but not this badly.
Speaking of WAL, this direction is indeed different, and programmable storage makes the logic much clearer.
But still, caution is necessary. The project with an annualized return of 20% last time was also hyped quite aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 18h ago
Haha, another victim of the storage track sharing their story. I'm tired of this script.
I just want to ask, can programmable storage really solve the problems of those previous projects, or are they just changing names to continue the scam?
View OriginalReply0
SellLowExpert
· 18h ago
Really, the storage track is a trap. Those are my painful lessons.
Basically, I was fooled once by high APY and never believed again.
Programmable storage sounds good, but bro, I have to think differently when I look at projects now.
WAL? I'll observe first and see. I'm afraid I'll fall into another pit.
Having been involved in the Web3 space for so many years, my biggest lesson comes from the storage sector. Honestly, I’ve had quite a few setbacks in this area—I've interacted with seven or eight storage projects, and the outcomes are usually twofold: either the team runs away, or the tokens are wiped out completely. Some of those valuable data have been permanently lost, others stored in the system can never be retrieved again. Every time I encounter a new decentralized storage project, I instinctively resist, thinking these are just old wine in new bottles, deceptive tricks.
It wasn’t until I came across the concept of programmable storage that my perspective gradually changed. After some in-depth research, I realized a harsh truth: the storage sector itself isn’t a fake demand; the problem lies in the fact that those previous project teams simply didn’t find the right direction. What they built had fundamental flaws in their technical philosophy. The programmable storage model, on the other hand, is what the Web3 storage ecosystem should look like. The WAL token isn’t just a speculative tool; it represents the core value of the entire ecosystem. Now, I have shifted all my positions in the storage sector toward this direction. This isn’t a fleeting impulse, but a firm choice made after thinking through the logic clearly.
Speaking of which, my previous understanding of decentralized storage was indeed superficial. At that time, I only thought: splitting data into fragments and dispersing them across different nodes means users don’t have to rely on a single company, so it’s safe. I never considered whether the product was user-friendly or whether it could connect with real-world applications. Looking back now, it was precisely this one-sided understanding that cost me dearly.
The most memorable mistake I made was two years ago. There was a storage project that was extremely popular at the time, with very enticing promotional copy—unlimited expansion, permanent storage, staking tokens with an annualized yield of over 20%. I was blinded by the promise of high returns, not only heavily bought into the tokens but also stored all my years of work materials and creative content there. Needless to say, the project eventually flopped, and those data disappeared along with it. That moment made me realize that the many failures in this sector weren’t due to storage demand itself being flawed, but because the execution completely deviated from actual application scenarios.