Some recent on-chain project developments are a bit confusing. They are gradually evolving into version 2.0, but what exactly are these teams doing? Their previous direction was quite good, so why the sudden shift? Or has the market demand changed? I find their strategic logic a bit hard to understand.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LeverageAddict
· 16h ago
Starting to change things again, I've seen this trick too many times before.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 01-10 21:06
It's another day of being taught by the market; a shift often means preparing for the next round. Believe that the dawn will eventually arrive.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-10 21:06
The team's recent actions are really disappointing. Where's the promised direction?
View OriginalReply0
metaverse_hermit
· 01-10 21:03
These projects' rebranding is just to scam new investors, the tricks haven't changed.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 01-10 21:00
It's that same 2.0 narrative again, really getting annoying.
Jumping on the bandwagon to change direction, is it because the funding hasn't come through?
The team is unsure of the direction, and holders are the ones taking the loss.
Talking about market demand, but it's just not well executed.
What about the previous hype? Now they're changing their tune.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 01-10 20:48
It's pretty outrageous, it feels like just gambling on the market trend.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 01-10 20:38
This is another project that has been completely transformed in its redesign; I should have stopped following it earlier.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-10 20:38
It's the same trick again, just changing the version number to try to make a quick profit. I really don't understand the logic behind it.
Some recent on-chain project developments are a bit confusing. They are gradually evolving into version 2.0, but what exactly are these teams doing? Their previous direction was quite good, so why the sudden shift? Or has the market demand changed? I find their strategic logic a bit hard to understand.