Many tokens issued by crypto projects look quite decent, often claiming governance rights or promising dividends. But what’s the reality? Most of them end up as decorations, with holders holding them for little practical use. Walrus’s WAL takes a different path.
Rather than being just a governance token, it’s better described as the "fuel" for the entire system. It’s needed for on-chain data storage, data retrieval, generating usability proofs, and node staking. Every step of the core business process directly involves the consumption or locking of WAL, meaning the more frequently it’s used, the more genuine and harder to manipulate the demand becomes.
What’s interesting about this design is— it completely ties the token’s value to "actual application." It doesn’t rely on hype stories or hollow promises, but on the natural behavior of users interacting with the network to drive circulation and destruction. As content explodes, read/write frequency increases, and long-term storage needs grow, the token’s liquidity and consumption also rise. This isn’t market manipulation; it’s the natural operation of supply and demand.
For developers and users, the benefits are quite tangible: a clear and predictable cost structure, system sustainability, and a straightforward "pay for what you use" logic. For pure speculators, short-term price pumps are hard to sustain because the fundamental support must come from real traffic.
The key turning point is when the application reaches scale. Once content generation surges, user numbers explode, and storage demands expand, WAL shifts from being "optional" to "absolutely necessary." At that moment, the power of this design becomes evident: value is rooted in the continuously used infrastructure, not fleeting marketing hype. That’s where true scarcity lies.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradFiRefugee
· 19h ago
Finally seeing a project that’s truly playing the game, but whether WAL will really take off depends on when the user base explodes
---
It’s another story of fuel coins, I’ve heard too many, the key is whether it can actually be used
---
This logic makes sense, but I want to know how the current user numbers are doing, not just empty talk
---
I like the strategy of binding tokens to application traffic, at least it’s better than those who just make big promises all day
---
It sounds ideal, but when the coin price drops, isn’t it still the same old cut the leeks
---
I just want to ask, can this really sustain to scale, or is it just another round of new stories
---
Rather than saying I’m optimistic about WAL, it’s more about seeing through the tricks of those fake governance coins
---
The core is still user growth, without that, everything else is just nonsense
---
This design indeed avoids pure hype, but success and failure are two sides of the same coin; price fluctuations are still significant
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 19h ago
This is the right path. Finally, there are projects that don't rely on storytelling.
---
WAL's design, I have to say, has some real substance. Genuine needs are much more reliable than governance rights.
---
Wait, doesn't that mean the more people use it, the more valuable the coin becomes? How to break the deadlock in the early stage?
---
Wow, directly tying the token's value to burning, traders really have no chance.
---
Sounds good, but I'm just worried that application deployment will be just the same old story.
---
A hundred times better than those air coins, at least the logic is self-consistent.
---
Scaling is key, but when will this thing be usable?
---
Relying on actual traffic instead of stories, it's a breath of fresh air in Web3.
---
Thinking of those promises of dividends that ended up paying nothing, Walrus's approach is truly different.
---
Natural supply and demand sound beautiful, but who guarantees that users will really come?
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 19h ago
Wow, finally seeing a token design that doesn't boast. The WAL concept is truly excellent.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 20h ago
To be honest, this is the design approach I want to see. Not some gimmick relying on whitepapers to fool people, but truly reflecting value through token circulation. The WAL concept has some substance; the fuel model is indeed much more reliable than governance tokens.
Many tokens issued by crypto projects look quite decent, often claiming governance rights or promising dividends. But what’s the reality? Most of them end up as decorations, with holders holding them for little practical use. Walrus’s WAL takes a different path.
Rather than being just a governance token, it’s better described as the "fuel" for the entire system. It’s needed for on-chain data storage, data retrieval, generating usability proofs, and node staking. Every step of the core business process directly involves the consumption or locking of WAL, meaning the more frequently it’s used, the more genuine and harder to manipulate the demand becomes.
What’s interesting about this design is— it completely ties the token’s value to "actual application." It doesn’t rely on hype stories or hollow promises, but on the natural behavior of users interacting with the network to drive circulation and destruction. As content explodes, read/write frequency increases, and long-term storage needs grow, the token’s liquidity and consumption also rise. This isn’t market manipulation; it’s the natural operation of supply and demand.
For developers and users, the benefits are quite tangible: a clear and predictable cost structure, system sustainability, and a straightforward "pay for what you use" logic. For pure speculators, short-term price pumps are hard to sustain because the fundamental support must come from real traffic.
The key turning point is when the application reaches scale. Once content generation surges, user numbers explode, and storage demands expand, WAL shifts from being "optional" to "absolutely necessary." At that moment, the power of this design becomes evident: value is rooted in the continuously used infrastructure, not fleeting marketing hype. That’s where true scarcity lies.