What is the most common phrase among beginner contract traders?n
"I know I should set stop-loss and take-profit, but as soon as I do, I get hit."n It sounds like self-deprecation, but it’s a stage that most people have gone through.n You’ve probably encountered this situation too: you open a long position, the price fluctuates slightly, and your stop-loss is hit instantly, then the market suddenly surges upward; or you hold a short position comfortably, but don’t set a take-profit, wanting to earn a bit more, only to watch your profits shrink or get trapped.n It seems like a technical issue, but the real problem lies elsewhere — you treat stop-loss and take-profit as mechanical buttons to press casually.n Wrong.n Stop-loss and take-profit are actually the most critical steps in the trading cycle. They are not just technical issues but also trading logic issues.n **The true significance of stop-loss is not to lose less money**n Many people dislike stop-loss, mainly due to psychological reasons — they think setting a stop-loss means admitting defeat.n But in the world of contracts, there is only one true game over: when you have no stop-loss mechanism.n Let’s look at a real scenario.n You find a very standard breakout pattern on the 15-minute chart of Bitcoin and decide to go long.n What is your psychological expectation?n "Once it breaks out, it should at least rise 3%."n But there’s another question you haven’t seriously considered:n "If it’s a false breakout, how much am I willing to lose?"n What’s the result? Many traders set a random stop-loss, maybe below the recent low, 0.3%, 0.5%, appearing cautious on the surface.n Then the market drops first, taking out your stop-loss, and then suddenly pulls up.n What conclusion do you draw?n "See, I got stopped out again, stop-loss is just a decoration."n It’s not really about the stop-loss. The real issue is that you’ve never clearly defined what constitutes a failed trade.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
What is the most common phrase among beginner contract traders?n
"I know I should set stop-loss and take-profit, but as soon as I do, I get hit."n
It sounds like self-deprecation, but it’s a stage that most people have gone through.n
You’ve probably encountered this situation too: you open a long position, the price fluctuates slightly, and your stop-loss is hit instantly, then the market suddenly surges upward; or you hold a short position comfortably, but don’t set a take-profit, wanting to earn a bit more, only to watch your profits shrink or get trapped.n
It seems like a technical issue, but the real problem lies elsewhere — you treat stop-loss and take-profit as mechanical buttons to press casually.n
Wrong.n
Stop-loss and take-profit are actually the most critical steps in the trading cycle. They are not just technical issues but also trading logic issues.n
**The true significance of stop-loss is not to lose less money**n
Many people dislike stop-loss, mainly due to psychological reasons — they think setting a stop-loss means admitting defeat.n
But in the world of contracts, there is only one true game over: when you have no stop-loss mechanism.n
Let’s look at a real scenario.n
You find a very standard breakout pattern on the 15-minute chart of Bitcoin and decide to go long.n
What is your psychological expectation?n
"Once it breaks out, it should at least rise 3%."n
But there’s another question you haven’t seriously considered:n
"If it’s a false breakout, how much am I willing to lose?"n
What’s the result? Many traders set a random stop-loss, maybe below the recent low, 0.3%, 0.5%, appearing cautious on the surface.n
Then the market drops first, taking out your stop-loss, and then suddenly pulls up.n
What conclusion do you draw?n
"See, I got stopped out again, stop-loss is just a decoration."n
It’s not really about the stop-loss. The real issue is that you’ve never clearly defined what constitutes a failed trade.