2026-01-10 14:21:54

I have probably shared about fifty or sixty projects, but there are some I will never mention. Although the risks don't seem significant, the key is that I simply don't trust them—either the team has a shady background or the data doesn't add up. To put it plainly, no matter how many projects you look at, it all comes down to one point: can it make money? That is the bottom line.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-10 14:50

Bro, you're so right. Integrity is more important than anything. I do the same—prefer to miss out rather than get involved in those shady dealings.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 01-10 14:50

Trust really is more valuable than risk; otherwise, even low risk is just a trap.

View OriginalReply0

GasWrangler

· 01-10 14:40

ngl, if you analyze the data on team histories it's demonstrably false that risk "looks small"—most rug vectors are mathematically predictable if you actually dig into the on-chain metrics. but yeah, bottom line checks out, technically speaking.

Reply0

StakeWhisperer

· 01-10 14:35

Really, it's better to miss out than to hit a landmine. That's the secret to living longer.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-10 14:28

Reliable, don't touch projects with abandoned teams; making money is the true way.

View OriginalReply0