2026-01-08 12:22:16

There's a fundamental paradox in crypto: when a token rises, we assume the project is solid; when it falls, we write it off as a failure. Yet most projects completely miss this opportunity to leverage market psychology in their favor.

The real culprit? For the majority of projects out there, tokens function purely as incentive mechanisms—nothing more. They were never architected to carry genuine economic value or scarcity premium. That's the brutal truth behind why market sentiment and token performance don't align with actual product development.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropLicker

· 15h ago

Basically, most project teams haven't really figured out how to use the tokens; it's just something they forcefully create for fundraising purposes. Tokens need to have substance, everyone. Don't just treat them as a pawn for scammers. No matter how strong your mental resilience is, you can't withstand a poor-performing product.

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 23h ago

Basically, this circle is just speculating on expectations. Tokens themselves have no value; they rely entirely on storytelling to harvest retail investors. This is the real truth, friends. Why don't project teams think about how to make their tokens truly valuable? Wait, do you really believe any project is genuinely working hard? Once the door opens, everyone is thinking about quick profits, no one cares about the aftermath calculations. Understanding the market from a psychological perspective? Uh... more like collective hallucination. The token design itself is flawed; no wonder it crashes as soon as it drops.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 01-08 13:08

Oh, basically most coins are just air with no real use case. Nowadays, some people still treat coin prices as project quality; the logic is absurd. Token design is completely terrible, who’s to blame... It's just paper money, do you really think it can be valuable? Wake up, everyone. The project team just wants to harvest the leeks, don’t overthink it. Tokens are worthless, they survive purely on hype. That's right, the market is all a psychological game; no one cares about the product. They build a mechanism just to raise funds; today's projects are truly hopeless. Price fluctuations are just like that; if the core is rotten, they still want to hide it... It's laughable.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 01-08 12:51

Basically, most project teams haven't really figured out what their token is supposed to do. They're still in the hype stage, treating themselves as the next BTC, which is really unsustainable. No use for tokens = no use for the project, that logic is flawless. Everyone's just playing hot potato, no one really wants to build a product. Absolutely, tokens need to have practical use cases, otherwise, what’s the point of their value? That's why most projects ultimately fail; they can't withstand the test of a bear market. Projects with economic significance and those without make a huge difference. Wake up, everyone. Not every token deserves your enthusiasm. At the end of the day, psychological games come down to fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

MemeKingNFT

· 01-08 12:50

Honestly, most project teams haven't thought about how to empower their tokens; they just rely on hype to cut leeks. I've seen through it long ago. --- This paradox, to put it simply, is because project teams are too inexperienced to understand market sentiment. --- So the difference between blue-chip and trash projects is right here... tokens need to have real utility. --- Uh, I can't quite understand why projects that have raised tens of millions of dollars haven't thought about this? --- The bottoming phase is the best time to see the true level of the project team—how many are still seriously developing the product... --- This is why I’ve always emphasized on-chain data; emotions can deceive, but the coins in your wallet won't. --- I used to believe in token incentives, but now I only trust projects with a real business model. Regretful. --- Leverage mentality is everywhere, but true rarity lies in those who understand economic value scarcity. --- Someone should have explained this properly long ago; too many projects are just tokens + air + promises. --- Speaking of which, those projects that persist in building products, their tokens have actually survived; the bottom consensus is right there.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 01-08 12:49

Basically, most coins are just air coins with no real use case. The rise and fall of tokens have nothing to do with the project itself; it's all about speculation. These project teams don't even understand basic economic models—who's to blame? The crypto world is like this; as long as you can harvest the leeks, who cares about real value? Honestly, I can't see many projects truly trying to do something; it's all about fundraising and cashing out. Emmmm so what should we do, wait for death? Tokens should have real applications, or they face the fate of zero value. This paradox is indeed heartbreaking, but this is the current situation, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

ContractTester

· 01-08 12:44

Basically, most coins are just air coins. Tokens lack real value support and are purely driven by hype. In fact, it's just the project teams being lazy and not thinking about how to empower their coins. This is the real truth about the crypto world; price fluctuations don't really reflect anything. Ironically, some projects haven't even figured out the purpose of their own coins.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 01-08 12:38

Basically, most coins are just air with no real application scenarios. Tokens themselves have no value and still need to create bubbles themselves—this is just nonsense. Psychological games haven't been mastered, and the products are a complete mess... It's just a means of incentive, once you see through it. Projects with real practical use cases don't have to worry about their prices at all.

View OriginalReply0