👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Sam-Bankman Fried Takes the Stand In Court, But With No Jury
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried testified for the first time during his own fraud trial on Thursday, in what expert onlookers are calling a “hail mary” to rescue himself from conviction.
The examination pertained to scandalous private Signal messages he’d shared with his former colleagues, and whether or not he was ever authorized to delete such messages.
Skimming the Terms of Service
As reported by CNN, Bankman-Fried argued that using heavily encrypted messaging apps like Signal was necessary to shield the company against “constant attempts to hack FTX. Meanwhile, he claimed used an “auto-delete” function on the app since Signal was typically a place for chatter rather than discussing policies or business records.
When asked by prosecutors if he believed deleting seven spreadsheets provided by Caroline Ellison showing different versions of FTX’s balance sheet was permissible, Bankman-Fried answered “yes,” according to Inner City Press.
Judge Kaplan dismissed the Jury for the testimony and will determine later if it can be repeated to jurors.
One of his defenses involved blaming his lawyers for recommending that he structure payments from Alameda to himself and others as loans, rather than dividends. He took comfort in knowing that his lawyers had recommended this method as a means of avoiding double taxation.
The ex-boss claimed to have “skimmed” FTX’s terms of service, which were drafted by both in-house and outside lawyers. When asked if he thought Alameda’s loans from FTX were in line with the TOS, he said “Um, yes, under many circumstances.”
Dodging Questions
As with many examples of his prior interviews on the matter, Bankman-Fried’s testimony was riddled with stuttering, vague, and meandering answers, claiming he “didn’t know” or “didn’t recall” many details when put under cross-examination.
At one point during cross-examination, Judge Kaplan called on the ex-CEO “listen to the question, and answer the question directly.”
According to CNN, Bankman-Fried fidgeted more and sipped more water between questions as the examination continued. When asked if he believed Alameda could spend FTX customer deposits, the founder said “I wouldn’t phrase it that way but I think the answer to the question I think you’re trying to ask is ‘yes.'”
Anthony Scarmucci – the founder of SkyBridge Capital who was close to Bankman-Fried – said in a Wednesday interview that Bankman-Fried decision to take the stand is “a very bad move for him” He added that he regrets introducing the founder to world leaders.