Decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend announced on February 16th that after three years of operation, it will cease all business activities. The team stated that multiple early-supported blockchains have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, oracle providers have stopped support, and frequent hacker attacks have led to long-term losses that make continued operation impossible. ZeroLend’s TVL has plummeted from a peak of nearly $359 million to just $6.6 million, a decrease of over 98%.
(Background: What is modular lending, and will it become the next DeFi hotspot?)
(Additional context: Detailed explanation of DeFi lending “liquidation mechanisms”: risk overview of Compound, Maker, AAVE)
Table of Contents
- The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits
- TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million
- Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users
- The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending
Multi-chain decentralized lending protocol ZeroLend issued an official announcement on February 16th, revealing a “difficult decision”—to terminate the protocol after three years of operation. The team admitted that the protocol has been in long-term loss and cannot sustain operations under multiple pressures. Currently, most market loan-to-value ratios (LTV) have been set to 0%, effectively prohibiting new borrowing, and only allowing users to withdraw funds.
The Four Main Causes of Death: Chain Depletion, Oracle Disruption, Hacker Attacks, Zero Profits
ZeroLend detailed four reasons for its closure in the announcement:
- Support chains become inactive: Several early deployed blockchains supported by ZeroLend have become inactive or experienced significant liquidity shrinkage, rendering the protocol’s operations on these chains essentially meaningless.
- Oracle providers cease support: Disruption of price data sources directly impacts the core lending and liquidation mechanisms of the protocol.
- Increase in hacker and scam attacks: The inherently high-risk nature of lending protocols makes them frequent targets for attacks.
- Thin profit margins lead to long-term losses: The profit space for lending protocols is extremely limited; combined with the above pressures, the situation worsens.
TVL Dropped from $359 Million to $6.6 Million
According to data from DefiLlama, ZeroLend’s total value locked (TVL) peaked at nearly $359 million in November 2024, but has since declined sharply, now remaining around $6.6 million, an evaporation of over 98%. This data vividly reflects the liquidity exhaustion across multiple chains.
Some Funds May Be Trapped: Attention for Manta, Zircuit, XLayer Users
ZeroLend strongly recommends users withdraw remaining funds from the platform as soon as possible via the official app. However, not all users can withdraw smoothly—on chains like Manta, Zircuit, and XLayer, where liquidity has severely deteriorated, some funds are currently locked and tied to inactive positions.
The team stated that solutions are being developed for these affected assets, including executing time lock upgrades to reallocate funds. However, specific timelines and details have not yet been announced, and whether trapped users can recover their full funds remains uncertain.
The Harsh Reality of DeFi Lending
ZeroLend’s collapse is not an isolated case but a reflection of the brutal reshuffling in the DeFi lending space. In this sector, major protocols like Aave and Compound already dominate most of the market share. Smaller protocols struggle to survive in a razor-thin profit margin environment, while also facing high maintenance costs across multiple chains, oracle dependency risks, and ongoing security threats.
For users holding assets on ZeroLend, the immediate priority is to withdraw funds from the platform and closely monitor any subsequent announcements regarding solutions for trapped assets.
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to
Disclaimer.
Related Articles
Circle Moves $68M in USDC to Speed Treasury Settlements
Circle processed $68M in intercompany transfers using USDC across 11 transactions involving eight global entities.
USDC settlements confirmed in under 30 minutes, replacing traditional bank wires that could take up to three days.
Faster settlement reduced cash-in-transit exposure and
CryptoFrontNews1h ago
Mega Bank's Director Rui-bin Zhuang tests stablecoin remittances, but the costs of blockchain are misunderstood.
Mega Financial Holding Co. held a media briefing on the 10th. Chairman Dong Rui-bin revealed that to objectively compare the efficiency of bank and blockchain remittances, Mega Bank mobilized 17 countries worldwide and 25 overseas branches last year for testing. Branch staff opened accounts at local legal exchanges and used the virtual asset trading platform BitoPro to trade USDT stablecoins, transferring 50 USDT each time back to Taiwan, and compared this with traditional bank cross-border wire transfers.
The results showed that stablecoins do have advantages for small-scale cross-border remittances. However, for remittance amounts exceeding the equivalent of NT$200,000 (about $7,000 USD), banks remain more cost-competitive.
Mega Experiment: Banks Are More Cost-Effective for Transfers Over $7,000 USD
The test results indicated that in the scenario of "paying NT$ in Taiwan and receiving local currency at the destination," bank wire transfers generally arrive within about 2 hours, with a fee of approximately
ChainNewsAbmedia3h ago
HyperGPT Launches HyperStore, an AI App Marketplace for Web3
HyperGPT has launched HyperStore, an AI app marketplace connecting developers and users, enabling app monetization and promotion within a growing community. Developers can showcase various AI products to earn revenue while simplifying access to Web3 users.
BlockChainReporter4h ago
Circle's USYC asset management surpasses $2 billion
Gate News Announcement, March 10 — The stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that as the application of tokenized money market funds continues to expand in the industry, the assets under management of its product USYC have surpassed $2 billion.
GateNews5h ago
Elon Musk's X Money App Nears Public Launch, No Sign of Dogecoin
Elon Musk's X Money will launch public beta in April, offering peer-to-peer transfers, direct deposits, and yield earning. Despite Musk's support for Dogecoin, the app currently has no crypto integration, though future features may include it.
Decrypt5h ago
Ripple Director Names Turkey, Nigeria and UAE as "Must-Watch" Markets - U.Today
Ripple's Reece Merrick outlined plans for the RLUSD stablecoin, targeting Turkey, Nigeria, and the UAE to enhance global expansion. These nations show significant digital dollar demand, critical for financial operations, with projections of $33 trillion in stablecoin transactions by 2025.
UToday5h ago