09:10 Observing TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is cold (Fear&Greed 26). In such conditions, "rebounds that don't extend/breaks that pull back" oscillations are more likely to occur. So I prefer to clarify the framework first, react according to price levels, rather than guessing direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation Level 3.76900000, B Support Break Level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retracement bounce zone, prioritizing volume observation and pullback speed. Only if price effectively breaks above A and stabilizes there does it qualify to upgrade from "spectating" to "considering following." Conversely, if it breaks below B again and stays there, the short-term trend must be acknowledged as weak—I'd rather do less than stubbornly hold on.

By the way, there's been lots of news recently about geopolitical conflicts and regulatory stances, but I only treat them as background noise, not verified facts, and certainly not trading signals. Thematic coins like these are more easily driven by news narratives—the more noise there is, the more I need to restrain position sizing and trading frequency. This is not a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you rather see it stabilize above B first before discussing rebounds, or directly surge with volume above A before considering participation?